Cited by 40Mosquito-borne diseases and controlDengue and Mosquito Control ResearchMalaria Research and Control

Evidence on impact of community-based environmental management on dengue transmission in Santiago de Cuba

Open access
Toledo, Maria E., Rodriguez, Adriana, Valdés, Luis, Carrión, Rigoberto, Cabrera, Georgina, Banderas, Digna, Ceballos, Enrique, Domeqc, Mireya +4 more·2011·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary: During the dengue outbreak that struck Santiago de Cuba in 2006–2007, we conducted an observational study in the Mariana Grajales district, the former setting of a community trial for Aedes aegypti control. In the trial, community working groups (CWG) had been created in 29 randomly selected intervention house blocks, and routine vector control activities alone were conducted in the remaining 30 control blocks. The CWG elaborated and implemented with the population plans and activities to reduce Aedes infestation. They were still functional in 2006 and continued organizing community‐based environmental management activities. The attack rate of dengue fever during the outbreak was 8.5 per 1000 inhabitants in the former intervention blocks and 38.1 per 1000 inhabitants in the control blocks, which corresponds to a relative risk of 4.5 (95% CI 3.1–6.5). There was a significantly higher proportion of unaffected intervention blocks, and affected blocks had on average substantially less cases than affected control blocks. This study indicates that community‐based environmental management inserted in the routine A. aegypti control programme can not only sustainably curb vector infestation but also have an impact on dengue transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02762.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining community-based environmental management with water container covers significantly reduced the odds of dengue incidence (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.15-0.32, p<0.0001).

    “Combined community-based environmental management together with the use of water container covers [58] also reduced the odds of dengue incidence to 0.22 (95% CI 0.15, 0.32; p<0.0001).”

    From Is Dengue Vector Control Deficient in Effectiveness or Evidence?: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [58]

    The intervention description (p. 2) includes manufacturing lids for water containers, and the results (p. 3) report substantially lower dengue attack rates in intervention blocks. But the paper reports a relative risk of 4.5 for control versus intervention blocks (95% CI 3.1–6.5), not an odds ratio of 0.22, and does not report p<0.0001 for dengue incidence. Container covers were one of several activities, not a separately evaluated addition. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nineteen of the included studies provided sufficient data for inclusion in meta-analyses.

    “Forty-one studies were included in the review [45–85] (S1 Table), nineteen of which reported sufficient data for inclusion in meta-analyses [46–48, 52, 54, 55, 58, 59, 66, 69, 73, 74, 76, 77, 80–83, 85].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Guzman MG, Pelaez O, Kouri G et al. (2006) Final characterization of and lessons learned from the dengue 3 epidemic in Cuba, 2001-2002. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica = Pan American Journal of Public Health 19 , 282-289.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toledo, M. E., Rodriguez, A., Valdés, L., Carrión, R., Cabrera, G., Banderas, D., Ceballos, E., Domeqc, M., Peña, C., Baly, A., Vanlerberghe, V., & Van der Stuyft, P.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kourí” (CU)
  • Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE)
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-21
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
744-747
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W1835019555
Cited by
40
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
dengue transmission, community-based environmental management, Aedes aegypti control, dengue outbreak, vector infestation, community-based trial, Santiago de Cuba
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Community Health Services, Cuba, Dengue, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Insect Vectors, Mosquito Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review