Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A functional MRI study of working memory task in euthymic bipolar disorder: evidence for task‐specific dysfunction

Monks, Paul J, Thompson, Jill M, Bullmore, Edward T, Suckling, John, Brammer, Michael J, Williams, Steve CR, Simmons, Andrew, Giles, Nicola, Lloyd, Adrian J, Louise Harrison, C, Seal, Marc, Murray, Robin M, Nicol Ferrier, I, Young, Allan H, Curtis, Vivienne A·2004·Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

Objectives: Even when euthymic bipolar disorder patients can have persistent deficits in working memory, but the neural basis of this deficit remains unclear. We undertook an functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of euthymic bipolar disorder patients performing two working memory paradigms; the two‐back and Sternberg tasks, selected to examine the central executive and the phonological loop respectively. We hypothesized that neuronal dysfunction would be specific to the network underlying the executive rather than the phonological loop component of working memory. Methods: Twelve right‐handed euthymic bipolar I males receiving lithium carbonate monotherapy were matched with 12 controls. The two‐back task comprised a single working memory load contrasted with baseline vigilance condition. The Sternberg paradigm used a parametric design incorporating variable working memory load with fixed delay between presentation of an array of items to be remembered and a target item. Functional activation data were acquired during performance of the tasks and were analysed to produce brain activation maps representing significant group differences in activation (ANOVA). Load–response curves were derived from the Sternberg task data set. Results: There were no significant between‐group differences (t‐test) in performance of the two‐back task, or in 2 × 5 group by memory load ANOVA for the performance data from Sternberg task. In the two‐back task, compared with controls bipolar disorder patients showed reductions in bilateral frontal, temporal and parietal activation, and increased activations with the left precentral, right medial frontal and left supramarginal gyri. No between‐group differences were observed in the Sternberg task at any working memory load. Conclusions: Our findings support the notion that, in euthymic bipolar disorder, failure to engage fronto‐executive function underpins the core neuropsychological deficits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00147.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Monks, P. J., Thompson, J. M., Bullmore, E. T., Suckling, J., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C., Simmons, A., Giles, N., Lloyd, A. J., Louise Harrison, C., Seal, M., Murray, R. M., Nicol Ferrier, I., Young, A. H., & Curtis, V. A.
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-12
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
550-564
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
OpenAlex
W2002337595
Cited by
174
References
11
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A functional MRI study of working memory task in euthymic bipolar disorder: evidence for task‐specific dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00147.x
The paper
Monks, P. J., Thompson, J. M., Bullmore, E. T., Suckling, J., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C., Simmons, A., Giles, N., Lloyd, A. J., Louise Harrison, C., Seal, M., Murray, R. M., Nicol Ferrier, I., Young, A. H., & Curtis, V. A. (2004). A functional MRI study of working memory task in euthymic bipolar disorder: evidence for task‐specific dysfunction. Bipolar Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00147.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.