Cited by 208Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major Depression

Efficacy of a protein kinase C inhibitor (tamoxifen) in the treatment of acute mania: a pilot study

Zarate, Carlos A, Singh, Jaskaran B, Carlson, Paul J, Quiroz, Jorge, Jolkovsky, Libby, Luckenbaugh, David A, Manji, Husseini K·2007·Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

Objectives: Considerable preclinical biochemical and behavioral data suggest that protein kinase C inhibition would bring about antimanic effects. Notably, the structurally highly dissimilar antimanic agents lithium and valproate, when administered in therapeutically relevant paradigms, attenuate protein kinase C inhibition function. There is currently only one relatively selective protein kinase C inhibitor that crosses the blood–brain barrier available for human use – tamoxifen. Our group recently conducted a single‐blind study with tamoxifen in acute mania and found that it significantly decreased manic symptoms within a short period of time (3–7 days). In this study, we investigated whether antimanic effects can be achieved with a protein kinase C inhibitor in subjects with mania. Methods: In a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, 16 subjects with bipolar disorder, manic or mixed, with or without psychotic features, were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen (20–140 mg/day; n = 8) or placebo (n = 8) for three weeks. Primary efficacy was assessed by the Young Mania Rating Scale. Results: Subjects on tamoxifen showed significant improvement in mania compared to placebo as early as five days, an effect that remained significant throughout the three‐week trial. The effect size for the drug difference was very large (d = 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.45–1.71) after three weeks (p = 0.001). At study endpoint, response rates were 63% for tamoxifen and 13% for placebo (p = 0.12). Conclusions: Antimanic effects resulted from a protein kinase C inhibitor; onset occurred within five days. Large, controlled studies with selective protein kinase C inhibitors in acute mania are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00530.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., Quiroz, J., Jolkovsky, L., Luckenbaugh, D. A., & Manji, H. K.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Zarate, Carlos A
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
561-570
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
OpenAlex
W2115516116
Cited by
208
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
tamoxifen, protein kinase C inhibition, acute mania, bipolar disorder, antimanic effects, Young Mania Rating Scale, lithium, valproic acid, blood-brain barrier
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Protein Kinase C, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Tamoxifen, Signal Transduction, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review