Cited by 158Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitions in bipolar affective disorder and unipolar depression: imagining suicide

Open access

Abstract

Hales SA, Deeprose C, Goodwin GM, Holmes EA. Cognitions in bipolar affective disorder and unipolar depression: imagining suicide. Bipolar Disord 2011: 13: 651–661. © 2011 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective: Bipolar disorder has the highest rate of suicide of all the psychiatric disorders. In unipolar depression, individuals report vivid, affect‐laden images of suicide or the aftermath of death (flashforwards to suicide) during suicidal ideation but this phenomenon has not been explored in bipolar disorder. Therefore the authors investigated and compared imagery and verbal thoughts related to past suicidality in individuals with bipolar disorder (n = 20) and unipolar depression (n = 20). Methods: The study used a quasi‐experimental comparative design. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV was used to confirm diagnoses. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered through questionnaire measures (e.g., mood and trait imagery use). Individual interviews assessed suicidal cognitions in the form of (i) mental images and (ii) verbal thoughts. Results: All participants reported imagining flashforwards to suicide. Both groups reported greater preoccupation with these suicide‐related images than with verbal thoughts about suicide. However, compared to the unipolar group, the bipolar group were significantly more preoccupied with flashforward imagery, rated this imagery as more compelling, and were more than twice as likely to report that the images made them want to take action to complete suicide. In addition, the bipolar group reported a greater trait propensity to use mental imagery in general. Conclusions: Suicidal ideation needs to be better characterized, and mental imagery of suicide has been a neglected but potentially critical feature of suicidal ideation, particularly in bipolar disorder. Our findings suggest that flashforward imagery warrants further investigation for formal universal clinical assessment procedures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00954.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Mansell W, 2007, The interpretations of, and responses to, changes in internal states: an intergrative cognitive model of mood swings, Behav Cogn Psychother, 35, 515
  2. Beck AT, 1991, Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation Manual
  3. First MB, 1996, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Disorders – Patient Edition (SCID‐I/P, Version 2.0)
  4. Beck AT, 1996, Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory‐II
  5. Barratt ES, 1983, Biological Basis of Sensation Seeking, Impulsivity, and Anxiety, 77
  6. Nelson HE, 1991, National Adult Reading Test Manual
  7. Cohen JW, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Hales, S. A., Deeprose, C., Goodwin, G. M., & Holmes, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Hales, Susie A
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11
Volume
13
Issue
7-8
Pages
651-661
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
OpenAlex
W2118935759
Cited by
157
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Wellcome Trust (WT088217)
  • Lupina Foundation
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10102)
  • Servier
  • Medical Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, suicidal ideation, mental imagery, suicidal cognitions, suicide risk assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review