Cited by 418Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionMigration, Health and Trauma

Depression Care in the United States: Too Little for Too Few

Open access
González, Hector M., Vega, William A., Williams, David R., Tarraf, Wassim, West, Brady T., Neighbors, Harold W.·2010·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and adequacy of depression care among different ethnic and racial groups in the United States. DESIGN: Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) data were analyzed to calculate nationally representative estimates of depression care. SETTING: The 48 coterminous United States. PARTICIPANTS: Household residents 18 years and older (N = 15 762) participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Past-year depression pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy using American Psychiatric Association guideline-concordant therapies. Depression severity was assessed with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report. Primary predictors were major ethnic/racial groups (Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Caribbean black, African American, and non-Latino white) and World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview criteria for 12-month major depressive episode. RESULTS: Mexican American and African American individuals meeting 12-month major depression criteria consistently and significantly had lower odds for any depression therapy and guideline-concordant therapies despite depression severity ratings not significantly differing between ethnic/racial groups. All groups reported higher use of any past-year psychotherapy and guideline-concordant psychotherapy compared with pharmacotherapy; however, Caribbean black and African American individuals reported the highest proportions of this use. CONCLUSIONS: Few Americans with recent major depression have used depression therapies and guideline-concordant therapies; however, the lowest rates of use were found among Mexican American and African American individuals. Ethnic/racial differences were found despite comparable depression care need. More Americans with recent major depression used psychotherapy over pharmacotherapy, and these differences were most pronounced among Mexican American and African American individuals. This report underscores the importance of disaggregating ethnic/racial groups and depression therapies in understanding and directing efforts to improve depression care in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.168

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]Institute of Medicine Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare 2003 The National Academies Press Washington, DC 25032386
  2. [16]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-Patient Edition (SCID-1/NP) 1997 Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York
  3. [18]Cochran WG Sampling Techniques 1977 Wiley New York, NY 3rd ed.
  4. [42]Alegría M Chatterji P Wells KB Cao Z Chen CN Takeuchi D Jackson J Meng XL Disparity in depression treatment among racial and ethnic minority populations in the United States Psychiatr Serv 2008 59 11 1264 1272 18971402 PMC2668139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
González, H. M., Vega, W. A., Williams, D. R., Tarraf, W., West, B. T., & Neighbors, H. W.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
37
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149115787
Cited by
418
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
60.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 67726, MH59575, K08MH067726, R01MH059575, R01MH068804, MH 68804)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
depression care, racial and ethnic disparities, Mexican Americans, African Americans, Puerto Ricans, guideline-concordant treatment, depression pharmacotherapy, major depressive episode, depression severity, Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Black or African American, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Ethnicity, Female, Health Services Research, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Prevalence, Mexican Americans, Caribbean Region, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review