Cited by 140Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health via Writing

BRIEF COMMUNICATION Parasuicide, depression and the anticipation of positive and negative future experiences

MacLEOD, A. K., PANKHANIA, B., LEE, M., MITCHELL, D.·1997·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that parasuicides' view of the future is characterized by an absence of anticipation of positive experiences rather than the presence of anticipation of negative experiences. The present study aimed to replicate this finding and examine whether it would also be found in parasuicides who were not depressed. METHOD: Depressed parasuicides (N = 27), non-depressed parasuicides (N = 17) and matched controls (N = 34) were assessed on their anticipation of future positive and negative experiences using an adapted fluency paradigm, where they were given a set time to generate future positive and negative anticipated experiences. RESULTS: Consistent with previous findings, parasuicides showed an overall reduced anticipation of positive experiences and no overall increased anticipation of negative experiences. However, the parasuicides did show evidence of increased negative anticipation for the immediate future. The results for depressed and non-depressed parasuicides were essentially the same. CONCLUSION: Lack of positive anticipation in the absence of increased negative anticipation is a feature of parasuicide. Although this lack of positive anticipation can occur in depression, it appears to be an independent feature of parasuicide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s003329179600459x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reasons for living, attainable positive future thinking, adaptive goal pursuit, belongingness or connectedness are motivational moderators that buffer against the emergence of suicidal ideation and intent.

    “Reasons for living [46], attainable positive future thinking [47,48], adaptive goal pursuit [49], belongingness [12] or connectedness [50] are MMs as they are thought to buffer against the emergence of suicidal ideation and intent”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacLEOD, A. K., PANKHANIA, B., LEE, M., & MITCHELL, D.
Affiliations
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1997-07
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
973-977
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W56376859
Cited by
140
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
parasuicide, depression, replication
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Suicide, Attempted, Thinking, Case-Control Studies, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review