Cited by 83Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

An Exploration of Prospective Imagery: The Impact of Future Events Scale

Deeprose, Catherine, Holmes, Emily A.·2010·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: Mental imagery of the future has clear clinical importance, although little is known about intrusive, prospective imagery of personally-relevant events. Currently, no measure is available to assess this. Aims: The Impact of Future Events Scale (IFES) was created to assess the impact of intrusive, prospective, personally-relevant imagery. It was examined in relation to predictions about dysphoria. Method: To form the IFES, the IES-R (a measure of the impact of a past traumatic event on posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology such as intrusive re-experiencing) was adapted item-by-item to assess intrusive “pre-experiencing” and imagery of specific, future events. Participants ( N = 75) completed the IFES and assessments of depression, anxiety and general imagery use. Results: As predicted, the IFES significantly and positively correlated with depression scores. Analyses using subgroups of non-dysphoric and mild-dysphoric participants confirmed that the mild-dysphoric group reported significantly higher IFES scores, indicating higher levels of pre-experiencing of the future and related hyperarousal and avoidance. Conclusions: IFES provides a measure of the impact of “pre-experiencing” in the form of intrusive prospective, personally-relevant imagery, with sensitivity to group differences on the basis of depression scores. Further research is required to extend these finding into clinical depression and other psychopathological conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465809990671

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deeprose, C., & Holmes, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Deeprose, Catherine
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2010-01-15
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
201-209
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2109839587
Cited by
83
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E000282/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
intrusive imagery, future events, dysphoria, depression, anxiety, hyperarousal, avoidance, scale development
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Imagination, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review