Cited by 28Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Does sperm morphology affect the outcome of intrauterine insemination in patients with normal sperm concentration and motility?

Open access
Sun, Y., Li, B., Fan, L. Q., Zhu, W. B., Chen, X. J., Feng, J. H., Yang, C. L., Zhang, Y. H.·2012·Andrologia

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of sperm morphology with the intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcome in patients with normal sperm concentration and motility. About 412 couples who underwent 908 IUI cycles were involved in the present study. A total of 110 clinical pregnancies were achieved with a pregnancy rate of 12.11% per cycle. The pregnancy rates per cycle were 7.60%, 12.67%, 13.62% and 13.13% in patients with <5%, 5-9%, 10-14% and >14% normal forms, respectively. The lowest pregnancy rate (7.60%) was obtained in the group with normal forms below 5%. However, this rate was not significantly different from other subgroups. Moreover, no pregnancies occurred in women >35 years old with normal sperm forms below 5%, in comparison with that in other subgroups of the same age. For women younger than 35 years old, no significant difference in pregnancy rate was observed in terms of different level of morphologically normal sperm. Our results show that for patients with normal sperm concentration and motility, IUI is recommended for first-line treatment when the woman is younger than 35 years, or morphologically normal sperm is ≥ 5%. IVF/ICSI should be performed when the normal forms are <5% and female age is > 35 years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2012.01280.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most recent studies of smaller series confirmed that sperm morphology had no impact on pregnancy rates after IUI.

    “Most recent studies, of smaller series, confirmed these results [76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83]”

    From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates across sperm-morphology groups, supporting the main point for couples with normal sperm concentration and motility. But the paper also reports no pregnancies among women over 35 when normal sperm forms were below 5%, so its findings do not support an unqualified claim that morphology had no impact. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Garceau L, Henderson J, Davis LJ, Petrou S, Henderson LR, McVeigh E, Barlow DH, Davidson LL (2002) Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod 17:3090-3109.
  2. Ghanem H, Shamloul R (2009) An evidence-based perspective to the medical treatment of male infertility: a short review. Urol Int 82:125-129.
  3. Menkveld R (2010) Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl 12:47-58.
  4. Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N, Lourdel E, Sanguinet P, Copin H (2010) Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 93:79-88.
  5. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2009) Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update 15:265-277.
  6. Van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Ombelet W (2001) Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 7:495-500.
  7. World Health Organization (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Y., Li, B., Fan, L. Q., Zhu, W. B., Chen, X. J., Feng, J. H., Yang, C. L., & Zhang, Y. H.
Affiliations
  • Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, B.
Venue
Andrologia
Published
2012-02-16
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
299-304
ISSN
0303-4569 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983622650
Cited by
28
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Andrologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Guangzhou Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
sperm morphology, intrauterine insemination, pregnancy rate, sperm motility, maternal age, IVF/ICSI
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Insemination, Insemination, Artificial, Homologous, Male, Maternal Age, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review