Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bone marrow stem cells‐derived microvesicles protect against renal injury in the mouse remnant kidney model

HE, JUAN, WANG, YAN, SUN, SHU, YU, MEINING, WANG, CUIYU, PEI, XIAOHUA, ZHU, BEI, WU, JIANQING, ZHAO, WEIHONG·2012·Nephrology

Abstract

Aims: Several studies have demonstrated administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) could reverse kidney injury by paracrine mechanisms rather than by MSC transdifferentiation. Recently, a few researchers found microvesicles (MV) derived from MSC might be a paracrine mechanism for cell‐to‐cell communication. The aim of this study was to investigate the repair effects of MV in a 5/6 subtotal nephrectomy (Nx) mice model. Methods: The animals were randomly divided into four groups: Control, Nx, Nx + MSC and Nx + MV group. MSC were injected (1 × 10 6/mouse) through caudal vein in Nx + MSC group at the second day after the surgery and MV were injected (30 µg/mouse) through caudal vein in Nx + MV group on alternate days. Mice were killed on day 7 after the first time of administration. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (Scr), uric acid (UA) and proteinuria were evaluated. Histopathology of kidney was analysed. Results: In Nx mice, the levels of Scr, UA and proteinuria were significantly decreased with administration of MV and MSC (P < 0.05). The remnant kidneys of MV and MSC‐treated Nx mice showed less fibrosis, interstitial lymphocyte infiltrates and less or absent tubular atrophy compared with the untreated Nx group. The Histological Score of Kidney in untreated mice was 3.13 ± 0.74, while in the MSC‐treated group it was 1.67 ± 0.47 and in the MV‐treated group it was 1.80 ± 0.44, nearly preserving normal morphology of the kidney (P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study showed MV protects against renal injury induced by 5/6 Nx, which could mimic the role of MSC in kidney repair. The research showed a newly potential therapeutic approach to kidney diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01589.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
HE, J., WANG, Y., SUN, S., YU, M., WANG, C., PEI, X., ZHU, B., WU, J., & ZHAO, W.
Venue
Nephrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-24
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
493-500
ISSN
  • 1320-5358 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1797
OpenAlex
W1963281756
Cited by
201
References
2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone marrow stem cells‐derived microvesicles protect against renal injury in the mouse remnant kidney model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01589.x
The paper
HE, J., WANG, Y., SUN, S., YU, M., WANG, C., PEI, X., ZHU, B., WU, J., & ZHAO, W. (2012). Bone marrow stem cells‐derived microvesicles protect against renal injury in the mouse remnant kidney model. Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01589.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.