Cited by 77Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsMethodologies in Health Research and PracticeBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Grounded theory method, part II: options for users of the method

Annells, Merilyn·1997·Nursing Inquiry

Abstract

Grounded theory method, part two: options for users of the method Era‐specific issues are presented for the consideration of the potential grounded theorist. Two of die issues are general to grounded theory mediod, while die otiier four assist in clarifying aspects relevant to die selection of a specific mode of die mediod. Five broad options regarding multiple possible modes of grounded dieory method are suggested and detailed. The inquirer is not limited to the two major modes usually presented and discussed in die literature. Users of the mediod are challenged to continue contributing to die development of die mediod, while justifying and debating mediodological modifications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1997.tb00096.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Annells, M.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Annells, Merilyn
Venue
Nursing Inquiry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
176-180
ISSN
  • 1320-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1800
OpenAlex
W2061093146
Cited by
76
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
grounded theory, method development, qualitative research methodology, nursing research
MeSH terms
Humans, Philosophy, Nursing, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Nursing Methodology Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review