Cited by 31Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Recovering from recurrent mental health problems: giving up and fighting to get better

Open access
Kartalova‐O'Doherty, Yulia, Tedstone Doherty, Donna·2010·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present selected findings of a grounded theory study that aims to explore individual processes and desired outcomes of recovery from recurrent health problems in order to build up a theoretical framework of recovery in an Irish context. Volunteers included mental health service users or participants of peer support groups who have experienced recurrent mental health problems for two or more years, consider themselves in improvement, and are willing to participate in individual interviews. The current paper is based on the analysis of 15 audiorecorded and transcribed interviews. We identified two open codes of 'giving up' and 'fighting to get better'. Giving up was associated with accepting a passive identity of a patient with a chronic mental illness and a lack of intrinsic motivation to get better. Fighting had both positive (fighting for) and negative (fighting against) dimensions, as well as internal and external ones. The fight for recovery entailed substantial and sometimes risky effort. Starting such a fight required strong, self-sustained motivation. Service providers might need to discuss internal and external motivators of fighting for recovery with service users, with a view to including such motivators in the care plans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00636.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accounts of recovery found in the literature that fall within this category include "being positive" (78), "being happy and successful" (67, 77), "finding hope and purpose" (48), or "having a meaningful and satisfying life" (69), without a deeper description about what this meant.

    “Accounts of recovery found in the literature that fall within this category include “being positive” (78), “being happy and successful” (67, 77), “finding hope and purpose” (48), or “having a meaningful and satisfying life” (69), without a deeper description about what this meant.”
  • A representative description of this understanding of recovery can be found in Kartalova-O'Doherty and Tedstone Doherty (77) "Personal definitions of recovery fell into two broad areas: getting rid of negative feelings, such as anxiety, depression, or panic attacks; and acquiring positive feelings and actions, such as peace of mind [...]."

    “A representative description of this understanding of recovery can be found in Kartalova-O'Doherty and Tedstone Doherty (77) “Personal definitions of recovery fell into two broad areas: getting rid of negative feelings, such as anxiety, depression, or panic attacks; and acquiring positive feelings and actions, such as peace of mind […].””
  • Another important aspect within this theme was the idea of recovery as having peace of mind.

    “Another important aspect within this theme was the idea of recovery as having peace of mind (59, 61, 77).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ralph R Kidder K Philips D Can We Measure Recovery? A Compedium of Recovery and Recovery-Related Instruments (PN-43) 2000 The Evaluation Centre@HSRI Cambridge, MA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kartalova‐O'Doherty, Y., & Tedstone Doherty, D.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-06
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
3-15
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2081047292
Cited by
31
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Board
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
chronic mental illness, giving up, patient identity, intrinsic motivation, peer support groups, service user experiences, care planning
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Convalescence, Humans, Recurrence, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review