Cited by 326Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

The rediscovery of recovery: open to all

Open access
Roberts, Glenn, Wolfson, Paul·2004·Advances in Psychiatric Treatment

Abstract

‘Recovery’ is usually taken as broadly equivalent to ‘getting back to normal’ or ‘cure’, and by these standards few people with severe mental illness recover. At the heart of the growing interest in recovery is a radical redefinition of what recovery means to those with severe mental health problems. Redefinition of recovery as a process of personal discovery, of how to live (and to live well) with enduring symptoms and vulnerabilities opens the possibility of recovery to all. The ‘recovery movement’ argues that this reconceptualisation is personally empowering, raising realistic hope for a better life alongside whatever remains of illness and vulnerability. This paper explores the background and defining features of the international recovery movement, its influence and impact on contemporary psychiatric practice, and steps towards developing recovery-based practice and services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/apt.10.1.37

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Allott, P., Loganathan, L. & Fulford, K. W. M. (2003) Discovering hope for recovery from a British perspective. In International Innovations in Community Mental Health (Special Issue) (eds S. Lurie, M. McCubbin & B. Dallaire). Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 21, in press.
  2. Hobbs, G. (1998) From My Madness. Nottingham: Poetry Monthly Press.
  3. Leibrich, J. (1999) A Gift of Stories: Discovering How to Deal with Mental Illness. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
  4. Ralph, R. O., Kidder, K. & Phillips, D. (2000) Can We Measure Recovery? A Compendium of Recovery and Recovery-Related Instruments (PN-43). Cambridge, MA: The Evaluation Centre@HSRI.
  5. Ridgeway, P. A. (2000) Re-storying psychiatric disability: learning from first person narrative accounts of recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24, 335-343.
  6. Royal College of Psychiatrists (2004) Rehabilitation and Recovery Now (Council Report CR121). London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. In press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, G., & Wolfson, P.
Venue
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
Published
2004-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
37-48
ISSN
  • 1355-5146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1481
OpenAlex
W2148766535
Cited by
326
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 31
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
recovery, recovery movement, severe mental illness, lived experience, self-empowerment, hope, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review