Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Degenerative Changes in Forebrain Cholinergic Nuclei Correlate with Cognitive Impairments in Aged Rats

Fischer, Walter, Gage, Fred H., Björklund, Anders·1989·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Degenerative changes in the forebrain cholinergic nuclei have been studied morphometrically in behaviourally characterized aged female Sprague‐Dawley rats. In all regions analysed (medial septum, diagonal band of Broca, nucleus basalis, and striatum) the acetylcholinesterase‐positive neurons were reduced in both size and number in the aged (24‐months‐old) rats as compared to the young (3‐months‐old) controls. The overall reduction in cell size amounted to between 20 and 30% and the overall reduction in cell number to between 27 and 45%. Impairment in learning and/or memory performance in the aged rats, as assessed in the Morris' water‐maze task, was significantly correlated with both cholinergic cell size and cell number in the medial septum, and with cholinergic cell number in the diagonal band of Broca and in the striatum. In the nucleus basalis there was a trend in the same direction but it did not reach significance. In contrast to these degenerative changes in the cell body regions, no significant differences in cortical or hippocampal choline acetyltransferase activity were detected biochemically between the young and the aged rats, and the enzyme activity levels did not correlate with the degree of behavioural impairment in the aged rats. The present results provide evidence that all major forebrain cholinergic cell groups undergo degenerative changes with age in the rat, and that the most severe changes are found in those rats which display the most profound spatial learning impairments. Despite the severe changes at the cell body level, however, the choline acetyltransferase activity in the cortical projection areas are affected only to a minor degree, perhaps as a result of functional compensatory changes at the terminal level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00772.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fischer, W., Gage, F. H., & Björklund, A.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
34-45
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2117120152
Cited by
334
References
2
FWCI
28.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.