The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is now widely used as a ‘virtual’ lesion paradigm to investigate behavioural functions, but the mechanisms through which it influences neural processing are unclear. To understand the differential effects of TMS on spatially overlapping populations of neurons we manipulated the relative activity levels of visual neurons by adapting subjects to a range of visual stimuli. By applying TMS to the visual cortex representing the central visual field we have shown in two experiments that the behavioural and perceptual effects of TMS depend on the state of adaptation of the neural population stimulated by TMS. Specifically, we have demonstrated that within the stimulated area TMS perceptually facilitates the attributes encoded by the less active neural population. We have demonstrated the generality of this principle for both suprathreshold and subthreshold TMS as well as for colour and orientation‐contingent colour using both subjective reports and psychophsyical measures. These findings can explain how TMS disrupts cognitive functions and therefore have implications for all studies which use TMS to disrupt behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness
Pascual-Leone, A., & Walsh, V. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057099 · Cited by 761
Self-citationStriate cortex (V1) activity gates awareness of motion
Silvanto, J., Cowey, A., Lavie, N., & Walsh, V. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1379 · Cited by 246
Self-citationMagnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers
Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2000) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200009280-00044 · Cited by 221
Self-citationKammer, T. (1998) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00093-1 · Cited by 170 · cited 1×
“These coordinates are most likely to correspond to visual cortical areas V1 ⁄ V2 in the case of foveal phosphenes and V2 ⁄ V3 for the unilateral phosphenes (Kastner et al., 1998; Kammer, 1999).”
Background
Cited by
State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition
Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N., & Walsh, V. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004 · Cited by 572
Self-citationSiebner, H. R., Funke, K., Aberra, A. S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Chen, R., Classen, J., Davare, M., Di Lazzaro, V., Fox, P. T., et al. (2022) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022 · Cited by 566
Methodology for Combined TMS and EEG
Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Kičić, D. (2010) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0123-4 · Cited by 431
State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Silvanto, J., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2008) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-008-0067-0 · Cited by 419
Self-citationThut, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0115-4 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N. G., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1874-1881
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2167223424
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05440.x
- The paper
- Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N. G., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2007). Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05440.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.