Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RNA interference in protozoan parasites: Protozoan parasites and RNAi

Open access
Ullu, Elisabetta, Tschudi, Christian, Chakraborty, Tirtha·2004·Cellular Microbiology

Abstract

RNA interference or RNAi is defined as the mechanism through which gene-specific, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) triggers degradation of homologous transcripts. Besides providing an invaluable tool to downregulate gene expression in a variety of organisms, it is now evident that RNAi extends its tentacles into both the nucleus and the cytoplasm and is involved in a variety of gene silencing phenomena. Here we review the current status of RNAi in protozoan parasites that cause diseases of considerable medical and veterinary importance throughout Africa, Asia and the Americas. RNAi was first discovered in Trypanosoma brucei, a species of the family Trypanosomatidae, and it rapidly became the method of choice to downregulate gene expression in these organisms. At the same time, mechanistic studies exposed a role for RNAi in the control of retroposon transcript abundance. Whereas RNAi is also present in T. congolense, other members of the same family of organisms, namely T. cruzi and Leishmania major, are RNAi-negative. In apicomplexan parasites, there is experimental evidence for RNAi in Plasmodium, but this is not supported by their genetic make up. In contrast, the genome of Toxoplasma gondii harbours gene candidates with convincing similarity to 'classical' RNAi genes. Thus, as previously shown in fungi, protozoan parasites are genetically heterogeneous as far as the RNAi pathway is concerned. Finally, database mining predicts that Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia intestinalis have an RNAi pathway and the presence of RNAi genes in Giardia supports the view that gene silencing by dsRNA appeared very early during evolution of the eukaryotic lineage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00399.x

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Ullu, E., Tschudi, C., & Chakraborty, T.
Venue
Cellular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04-15
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
509-519
ISSN
  • 1462-5814 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-5822
OpenAlex
W1503077302
Cited by
290
References
72
FWCI
20.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RNA interference in protozoan parasites: Protozoan parasites and RNAi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00399.x
The paper
Ullu, E., Tschudi, C., & Chakraborty, T. (2004). RNA interference in protozoan parasites: Protozoan parasites and RNAi. Cellular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00399.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.