Cited by 139Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intranasal administration of insulin to the brain impacts cognitive function and peripheral metabolism

Ott, V., Benedict, C., Schultes, B., Born, J., Hallschmid, M.·2012·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

In recent years, the central nervous system (CNS) has emerged as a principle site of insulin action. This notion is supported by studies in animals relying on intracerebroventricular insulin infusion and by experiments in humans that make use of the intranasal pathway of insulin administration to the brain. Employing neurobehavioural and metabolic measurements as well as functional imaging techniques, these studies have provided insight into a broad range of central and peripheral effects of brain insulin. The present review focusses on CNS effects of insulin administered via the intranasal route on cognition, in particular memory function, and whole‐body energy homeostasis including glucose metabolism. Furthermore, evidence is reviewed that suggests a pathophysiological role of impaired brain insulin signaling in obesity and type 2 diabetes, which are hallmarked by peripheral and possibly central nervous insulin resistance, as well as in conditions such as Alzheimer's disease where CNS insulin resistance might contribute to cognitive dysfunction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01490.x

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 119 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. van Dijk G, 1997, Insulin in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus reduces fat consumption in rats., Brain Res, 777, 147
  2. 10.1097/00019442-200511000-00005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 139

Metadata

Authors
Ott, V., Benedict, C., Schultes, B., Born, J., & Hallschmid, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH)
Corresponding author
Ott, V.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-16
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
214-221
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2124783702
Cited by
139
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
intranasal insulin, brain insulin signaling, cognitive function, memory, energy homeostasis, glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, obesity, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Obesity, Receptor, Insulin, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review