Cited by 387Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Prevalence of impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes

Geddes, J., Schopman, J. E., Zammitt, N. N., Frier, B. M.·2008·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is thought to affect approximately 25% of people with Type 1 diabetes. While this estimate was based on retrospective information from patients in several small studies performed several years ago, validated methods of assessment have not been used in a large hospital clinic-based population to ascertain the prevalence in the present era. Methods Five hundred and eighteen people with Type 1 diabetes were recruited by random selection over a 2-year period. Participants completed a questionnaire documenting baseline characteristics and assessment of their awareness status using the method described by Gold et al. The number of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia they had experienced in the preceding year was recorded retrospectively. Results IAH was present in 19.5% of the cohort. Compared to those with normal awareness of hypoglycaemia, those with IAH were significantly older [mean +/- standard deviation (sd); 39.3 +/- 12.9 vs. 45.9 +/- 13.5 years, P Conclusions The present survey of a large hospital-based clinic population has confirmed that a significant proportion of people with Type 1 diabetes (19.5%) continue to have IAH. Despite improvements in insulin therapies, intensification of insulin regimens and innovative patient education, the prevalence of IAH remains high in Type 1 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02413.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geddes, J., Schopman, J. E., Zammitt, N. N., & Frier, B. M.
Affiliations
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Frier, B. M.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
501-504
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2144991899
Cited by
387
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia, type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia, prevalence, severe hypoglycemia, diabetes duration, age
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Awareness, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review