CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Digital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingBusiness Strategy and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE ECONOMICS OF NETWORKS: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE

Birke, Daniel·2009·Journal of Economic Surveys
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00578.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

AbstractNetwork effects, the increase in value of consuming a product if many other consumers use the same product, are a feature of many markets and in particular of many high‐technology products. This paper surveys the burgeoning empirical literature that has developed especially during the last years. After theoretical work dominated the earlier years of research in this area, newer research has combined theoretical models with empirical studies and applied work with direct implications for public policy, marketing and company strategies. Furthermore, insights from the study of social networks have been applied to analyse how consumers interact with each other. The paper argues that a closer analysis of the network structure of consumer interaction promises fruitful future research avenues and advances in our understanding of how network effects operate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00578.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00040.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1287/isre.1040.0020 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/1467-6451.00200 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/2555829 · DOI
  6. Besen S.M., 1986, Compatibility Standards, Competition, and Innovation in the Broadcasting Industry
  7. Birke D., 2008, Bildung von sozialen Netzwerken in Anwendungen der Social Software
  8. Birke D.andSwann G.M.P.(2005)Social networks and choice of mobile phone operator. Available athttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=944354; last accessed 13 April 2009. · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00191-005-0001-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1627 · DOI
  11. Cabral L.M.B., 1992, The Economics of Information Networks, 129
  12. 10.2307/2950628 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0167-7187(93)90006-X · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2005.00268.x · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0022050700037153 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/2235561 · DOI
  17. David P.A., 1985, Clio and the economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, 75, 332
  18. 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2006.11.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00363.x · DOI
  20. Dube J.‐P. Hitsch G.J.andChintagunta P.(2008)Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Chicago GSB Research Paper No. 08‐08. Available at SSRN:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1085909; last accessed 13 April 2009.
  21. Economides N., 1994, Global Telecommunications Strategies and Technologies Changes, 227
  22. 10.1016/0167-7187(96)01015-6 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2307/2555589 · DOI
  24. Farrell J., 1986, Installed base and compatibility – innovation, product preannouncements, and predation, American Economic Review, 76, 940
  25. 10.1016/S0308-5961(02)00015-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00009-X · DOI
  27. 10.2307/2555859 · DOI
  28. 10.2307/2601028 · DOI
  29. 10.1086/344399 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/1593691 · DOI
  31. Grajek M.(2007)Estimating network effects and compatibility in mobile telecommunications. ESMT Working Paper 07‐001. Available athttp://www.esmt.org/fm/294/ESMT‐07‐001.pdf; last accessed 13 April 2009. · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.08.003 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00069-8 · DOI
  34. 10.1287/mksc.18.3.396 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s11002-008-9048-z · DOI
  36. Katz M.L., 1985, Network externalities, competition, and compatibility, American Economic Review, 75, 424
  37. 10.1086/261409 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1257/jep.8.2.93 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0167-6245(02)00070-7 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s11151-004-4085-0 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/978-3-322-99611-4 · DOI
  42. 10.2307/2555815 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/1882692 · DOI
  44. 10.1086/467198 · DOI
  45. 10.1257/jep.8.2.133 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.05.006 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.telpol.2003.12.002 · DOI
  48. 10.2307/2298123 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Miller A.R.andTucker C.(2007)Privacy network effects and electronic medical record technology adoption. Available at SSRN:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=960233; last accessed 13 April 2009.
  50. 10.1023/B:QMEC.0000017034.98302.44 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00447.x · DOI
  52. 10.1162/0034653043125275 · DOI
  53. 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400 · DOI
  54. 10.2307/2098492 · DOI
  55. Prieger J.E.andHu W.M.(2006)An empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the home video game market. Available athttp://ideas.repec.org/p/net/wpaper/0625.html; last accessed 13 April 2009. · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.2307/3003090 · DOI
  58. Rohlfs J., 2001, Bandwagon Effects in High‐Technology Industries, 10.7551/mitpress/1509.001.0001 · DOI
  59. Ryan S.andTucker C.(2008)Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. NET Institute Working Paper No. 06‐26. Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=941224; last accessed 13 April 2009.
  60. 10.1111/0034-6527.00512 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00301.x · DOI
  62. 10.2307/2555999 · DOI
  63. Scott J., 2000, Social Network Analysis: A Handbook
  64. 10.1002/smj.296 · DOI
  65. Shapiro C., 1999, Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
  66. 10.1016/0167-6245(93)90012-6 · DOI
  67. 10.1017/CBO9780511754401 · DOI
  68. 10.5465/amj.2005.17843947 · DOI
  69. Sundararajan A.(2006)Local network effects and complex network structure. Available athttp://oz.stern.nyu.edu/papers/lne.pdf; last accessed 13 April 2009. · DOI
  70. 10.1016/S0167-6245(02)00051-3 · DOI
  71. Thum M., 1995, Netzwerkeffekte, Standardisierung und staatlicher Regulierungsbedarf
  72. 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0897 · DOI
  73. Veljanovski C.(2006)Network effects and two‐sided markets Available at SSRN:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1003447; last accessed 13 April 2009.
  74. 10.1017/CBO9780511815478 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Birke, D.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Birke, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Economic Surveys
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-06
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
762-793
ISSN
  • 0950-0804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6419
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00578.x
OpenAlex
W3122511565
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
20.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Journal of Economic Surveys (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
network effects, network economics, high-tech products, consumer interaction, social networks, public policy, marketing strategy, business strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review