Cited by 285Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Stated expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomes

IRWIN, FRANCIS W.·1953·Journal of Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1953.tb01775.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
IRWIN, F. W.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
IRWIN, FRANCIS W.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1953-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
329-335
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2107175898
Cited by
281
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
outcome probability, outcome expectations, subjective probability
MeSH terms
Behavior, Humans, Motivation, Probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review