Cited by 270Reading and Literacy DevelopmentTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain

Open access
James, Karin Harman·2010·Developmental Science

Abstract

Since Broca’s studies on language processing, cortical functional specialization has been considered to be integral to efficient neural processing. A fundamental question in cognitive neuroscience concerns the type of learning that is required for functional specialization to develop. To address this issue with respect to the development of neural specialization for letters, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare brain activation patterns in pre‐school children before and after different letter‐learning conditions: a sensori‐motor group practised printing letters during the learning phase, while the control group practised visual recognition. Results demonstrated an overall left‐hemisphere bias for processing letters in these pre‐literate participants, but, more interestingly, showed enhanced blood oxygen‐level‐dependent activation in the visual association cortex during letter perception only after sensori‐motor (printing) learning. It is concluded that sensori‐motor experience augments processing in the visual system of pre‐school children. The change of activation in these neural circuits provides important evidence that ‘learning‐by‐doing’ can lay the foundation for, and potentially strengthen, the neural systems used for visual letter recognition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00883.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bader L.A., 2005, Bader Reading and Language inventory
  2. James T.W., 2005, Touch and blindness: Psychology and neuroscience, 65
  3. Montessori M., 1912, The Montessori Method
  4. Piaget J., 1953, The origins of intellegence in the child
  5. Sporns O., 2002, MIT handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 46
  6. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.397 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
James, K. H.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
James, Karin Harman
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-02
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
279-288
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2107057632
Cited by
269
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
18.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Lilly Endowment
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057077)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
alphabet learning, visual association cortex, preschool children, hands-on learning, neural development, writing practices, reading development
MeSH terms
Brain, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Development, Functional Laterality, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reading, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review