Cited by 255Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentParental Involvement in EducationSchool Choice and Performance

Family Socioeconomic Status and Consistent Environmental Stimulation in Early Childhood

Open access
Crosnoe, Robert, Leventhal, Tama, Wirth, R J, Pierce, Kim M, Pianta, Robert C, NICHD Early Child Care Research Network·2010·Child Development

Abstract

The transition into school occurs at the intersection of multiple environmental settings. This study applied growth curve modeling to a sample of 1,364 American children, followed from birth through age 6, who had been categorized by their exposure to cognitive stimulation at home and in preschool child care and 1st-grade classrooms. Of special interest was the unique and combined contribution to early learning of these 3 settings. Net of socioeconomic selection into different settings, children had higher math achievement when they were consistently stimulated in all 3, and they had higher reading achievement when consistently stimulated at home and in child care. The observed benefits of consistent environmental stimulation tended to be more pronounced for low-income children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01446.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Congruent, nurturing learning environments at home and school increase children's academic motivation and achievement.

    “Congruent, nurturing learning environments at home and school have been shown to boost children’s academic motivation and achievement (Crosnoe, Leventhal, Wirth, Pierce, & Pianta, 2010).”

    From Cultural Socialization Across Contexts: Family–Peer Congruence and Adolescent Well-Being (2016) · cites this paper as Crosnoe, Leventhal, Wirth, Pierce, & Pianta, 2010

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports higher reading and math achievement among children exposed to consistent cognitive stimulation across specified settings. The Discussion (page unavailable) qualifies these associations by noting that some reflected family socioeconomic circumstances. The paper does not establish that nurturing environments boost academic motivation, and its achievement findings do not support an unqualified causal claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network 2005b Early child care and children's development in the primary grades American Educational Research Journal 43 537 570

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crosnoe, R., Leventhal, T., Wirth, R. J., Pierce, K. M., Pianta, R. C., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Crosnoe, Robert
Venue
Child Development
Published
2010-05-01
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
972-987
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2171626666
Cited by
255
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
FWCI
64.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Harvard University
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Washington
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • RTI International
  • Temple University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of California, San Diego
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • University of California, Irvine
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD025456, U10HD027040, U10HD025451, U10HD025460, U10HD025449, R01HD055359, U10HD025455, U10HD025445, U10HD025447, U10HD025420)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
family socioeconomic status, environmental stimulation, early childhood, cognitive stimulation, family environment, classroom climate, school readiness, mathematics achievement, reading achievement, low-income children, early learning
MeSH terms
Achievement, Child, Child Day Care Centers, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Family, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Learning, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mathematics, Reading, Sex Factors, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review