Cited by 236Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

How (and Why) Emotion Enhances the Subjective Sense of Recollection

Open access
Phelps, Elizabeth A., Sharot, Tali·2008·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests emotion boosts memory accuracy to an extent but affects the subjective sense of recollection even more. The result is vivid memories for emotional events that are held with confidence but that may be surprisingly inaccurate in their details. We examine the neural circuitry underlying emotion's impact on memory and the subjective sense of recollection to provide insight into this puzzling phenomenon. This research suggests that for emotional stimuli the quality and strength of memory for a few details may mediate judgments of recollection, whereas for neutral stimuli the quantity of contextual details may be more important. Finally, we speculate that the enhanced subjective sense of recollection with emotion, in the absence of absolute veridicality, may have evolved to enable fast and unambiguous decision making in emotional situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00565.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Mather M. Reviews the impact of emotion on memory for details. 2007. (See References) [Google Scholar]
  2. Phelps EA. (See References) 2006. Reviews emotion’s impact on cognition, as it is linked to the human amygdala. [Google Scholar]
  3. Reisberg D, Heuer F. Reviews emotion’s impact on different aspects of the event. 2004. (See References) [Google Scholar]
  4. Sharot T, Delgado MR, Phelps EA. Demonstrates that different neural mechanisms are linked to the subjective sense of remembering for emotional scenes. 2004. (See References) [Google Scholar]
  5. Talarico JM, Rubin DC. Demonstrates the dissociation between memory confidence and accuracy for flashbulb memories of 9/11. 2003. (See References) [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phelps, E. A., & Sharot, T.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Phelps, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2008-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
147-152
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2068276368
Cited by
236
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062104)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
emotion and memory, memory confidence, memory vividness, memory accuracy, emotional decision-making, evolution of memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review