The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Displays and Decision Processes
Abstract
Information displays influence decision processes by facilitating some decision strategies while hindering others. Component characteristics of displays, such as the form, organization, and sequence of information, influence decision processes through an adaptive mechanism whereby a decision maker balances the desire to maximize accuracy against the desire to minimize effort. Variations in the information display lead to changes in the anticipated effort and anticipated accuracy of each available strategy and, therefore, provide an incentive for decision makers to use different decision processes. Research in this area can provide guidance regarding the use of displays and other decision-aiding approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173933 · Cited by 3,487
Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing.
Arkes, H. R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486 · Cited by 764
Cited by
Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment
Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005 · Cited by 2,061
Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids
Häubl, G., & Trifts, V. (2000) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.19.1.4.15178 · Cited by 1,731
Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x · Cited by 475
Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.4.356 · Cited by 312
Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making
Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Dierckx, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730 · Cited by 280
Product-Related Deception in E-Commerce: A Theoretical Perspective1
Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043494 · Cited by 265
Western University, Sedig, K., Parsons, P., & Western University (2013) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00055 · Cited by 145
Does Explainable Artificial Intelligence Improve Human Decision-Making?
Alufaisan, Y., Marusich, L. R., Bakdash, J. Z., Zhou, Y., & Kantarcioglu, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16819 · Cited by 106
Demand-Driven Transparency for Monitoring Intelligent Agents
Vered, M., Howe, P., Miller, T., Sonenberg, L., & Velloso, E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2020.2988859 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Schkade, D. A.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-227
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2128929122
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
