The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy and Distortion in Memory for High School Grades
Abstract
The relation between accuracy and distortion of autobiographical memory content was examined by verifying 3,220 high school grades recalled by 99 college students Accuracy of recall declined monotonically with letter grade, from 89% for grades of A to 29% for grades of D The positive correlation between achievement and accuracy of recall is attributed to more frequent rehearsals of affectively positive content and to greater accuracy of reconstructive inferences based on homogeneous, generic memories Most errors inflated the verified grade, and the degree of asymmetry of the error distribution is used as an index of the degree of distortion Distortions are attributed to reconstructions in a positive, emotionally gratifying direction Contrary to expectation, the percentage of accurate recall and the degree of asymmetry of the error distribution were uncorrelated This finding indicates that the process of distortion does not cause forgetting of the veridical content Rather, distortion reflects bias in reconstructive inferences that occur after the veridical content has been forgotten for other reasons
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
The relation of affective tone to the retention of experiences of daily life.
Waters, R. H., & Leeper, R. (1936) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062328 · Cited by 52
Memory for unique personal events: Effects of pleasantness
Thompson, C. P. (1985) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf00991832 · Cited by 42
Cited by
Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005 · Cited by 1,910
Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806
Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075001063 · Cited by 1,137
THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY
Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., & Koutstaal, W. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.289 · Cited by 827
The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: A meta-analysis
Kim, K. R., & Seo, E. H. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.038 · Cited by 786
Metadata
- Authors
- Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., & Berger, S. A.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 265-271
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2002753534
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy and Distortion in Memory for High School Grades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00372.x
- The paper
- Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., & Berger, S. A. (1996). Accuracy and Distortion in Memory for High School Grades. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00372.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.