Cited by 256Personality Traits and PsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Relational self-worth: Differences in perceived worth as a person across interpersonal contexts among adolescents

Harter, Susan, Waters, Patricia, Whitesell, Nancy R·1998·Child Development

Abstract

The present study investigated the hypothesis that in addition to perceptions of one's global self-worth as a person, individuals evaluate their self-worth differently across relational contexts. Perceptions of self-worth among adolescents were examined in 4 such contexts: with parents, teachers, male classmates, and female classmates. The factor pattern revealed a clear, 4-factor solution with negligible cross-loadings. Approximately three-fourths of the participants reported differences in self-worth, ranging from small to large, across contexts. To examine the basis for differences and similarities across relationships, self-worth in each context was predicted by the validation support reported by adolescents in that context. Support in a given context was significantly more highly correlated with relational self-worth in the corresponding context than in any of the other contexts. Adolescents could be divided into subgroups based upon the high correlation between self-worth in one particular context and global self-worth. These findings suggest that how an individual evaluates the self in certain relationships is critical to his or her overall sense of worth as a person.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06241.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harter, S., Waters, P., & Whitesell, N. R.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
  • Harter, Susan
  • Waters, Patricia
  • Whitesell, Nancy R
Venue
Child Development
Published
1998-06-01
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
756-766
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2155870673
Cited by
256
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
global self-worth, adolescents, interpersonal context, parent-adolescent relationships, teacher-adolescent relationships, peer relationships, self-esteem
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Personality Inventory, Self Concept, Social Environment, Social Perception, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review