The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Structural Connectivity Underpinning Language Aptitude, Working Memory, and IQ in the Perisylvian Language Network
Abstract
In this article, we report the results of a study on the relationship between individual differences in language learning aptitude and the structural connectivity of language pathways in the adult brain, the first of its kind. We measured four components of language aptitude (vocabulary learning; sound recognition; sound‐symbol correspondence; and grammatical inferencing) using the LLAMA language aptitude test. Spatial working memory, verbal working memory and IQ were also measured as control factors. Diffusion Tensor Imaging was employed to investigate the structural connectivity of language pathways in the perisylvian language network. Regression analysis suggested significant correlations between most of these behavioural measures and the structural connectivity of certain language pathways, that is, grammatical inferencing and the BA45‐ and BA46‐Temporal pathway, sound‐symbol correspondence and the interhemispheric BA45 pathway, vocabulary learning and the BA47‐Parietal pathway, IQ and the BA44‐ and BA‐47Parietal pathways, the BA47‐Temporal pathway and interhemispheric BA45 pathway, spatial working memory and the interhemispheric BA6 pathway and the BA47‐Parietal pathway, and verbal working memory and the BA47‐Temporal pathway. These findings provide further insights into the neural underpinnings of the variation in language aptitude of human adults and are discussed in relation to relevant findings in the literature.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neurobiological perspectives have produced the most compelling evidence for the critical role of phonological working memory in essential aspects of L2 learning, including phonology, vocabulary, and grammar/sequence rules.
“the neurobiological perspectives (such as those studies conducted by Golestani and Yang) have produced the most compelling evidence for the critical role of phonological working memory in essential aspects of L2 learning, including phonology, vocabulary, and grammar/sequence rules”
From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Xiang et al. 2012
Aptitude could be linked to neurolinguistic research on brain connectivity networks.
“Aptitude could be linked to this research (Schumann 2004;Carpenter 2008;Xiang et al. 2012).”
From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Xiang et al. 2012
Citations
Cites
N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies.
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20131 · Cited by 3,560
The neuroscience of human intelligence differences
Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2793 · Cited by 1,038
Genetics of brain fiber architecture and intellectual performance
Chiang, M.-C., Barysheva, M., Shattuck, D. W., Lee, A. D., Madsen, S. K., Avedissian, C., Klunder, A. D., Toga, A. W., McMahon, K. L., de Zubicaray, G. I., et al. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4184-08.2009 · Cited by 406
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1002/mrm.1105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0086 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mrm.10609 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/awp206 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0702116104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hbm.10130 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00004-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.249 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0013164406288169 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.053 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X07001185 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmri.1076 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hbm.20779 · DOI
- 10.1177/0023830910388000 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00429-008-0199-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhh186 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/431757a · DOI · Paper page
- Meara P., 2005, Llama Language Aptitude Tests. The manual
- 10.1038/nn1077 · DOI
- 10.1006/nimg.1999.0441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4442-06.2007 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00429-009-0211-y · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2008.128 · DOI
- 10.1002/bies.20641 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.20.12061 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.057 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.35 · DOI
- Wechsler D., 1997, Wechsler memory scale–Third edition
- 10.1080/87565641.2010.508551 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhp119 · DOI
- Xiang H. D., L2‐proficiency‐dependent laterality of structural connectivity on brain language pathways, Brain and Language
- Yu A. C. L., 2010, Perceptual compensation is correlated with individuals’“autistic” traits: Implications for models of sound change, PLoS One, 5
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Wen, Z. (., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000276 · Cited by 248
Examining Individual Differences in Language Learning: A Neurocognitive Model of Language Aptitude
Turker, S., Seither-Preisler, A., & Reiterer, S. M. (2021) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00042 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiang, H., Dediu, D., Roberts, L., Oort, E. V., Norris, D. G., & Hagoort, P.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-16
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- s2
- Pages
- 110-130
- ISSN
- 0023-8333
- 1467-9922
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review