Organizational Rituals: Features, Functions and Mechanisms
Abstract
This review identifies the defining features of rituals and their functions in organizations, culminating in two key claims. First, organizational rituals can be described on a spectrum based on the fullness and degree of their expression. Complete or ‘full’ organizational rituals possess a greater number and intensity of ritual features than ‘ritual-like’ activities. The efficacy of an activity corresponds to its alignment with the features of full rituals. Ritual-like activities are therefore less powerful and more frequent organizational events than full rituals. Second, it is theorized that rituals work through three mutually reinforcing mechanisms: cognitive capture, emotional anchoring and behavioural prescription. It is proposed that rituals work by channelling (1) cognitive content, (2) affective responses and (3) behavioural activity toward the cultural expectations of organizations and their members. Organizational rituals may be characterized as standardized, rule-bound, predictable and repetitive behaviours undertaken in conditions demanding explicit performance expectations. Rituals are physically enacted to conform to a specified and invariable sequence, and are invested with added significance through a combination of formality and symbolism. Nine inter-dependent functions of rituals are specified, which are to: (1) provide meaning; (2) manage anxiety; (3) exemplify and reinforce the social order; (4) communicate important values; (5) enhance group solidarity; (6) include and exclude others; (7) signal commitment; (8) manage work structure; and (9) prescribe and reinforce significant events. These functions underline the role that rituals play as communication and learning systems, drawing attention to what is important and helping to funnel the thoughts, feelings and behaviours of organizational members. Organizational rituals are particularly important because they not only illuminate organizational behaviour, but also entrench or challenge existing cultural values.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rituals tend to be invariable in their performance, unlike habits or routines.
“In contrast to habits or routines, which may change each time they are performed, rituals tend to be invariable in their performance (Rappaport, 1999;Smith & Stewart, 2011).”
From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Smith & Stewart, 2011
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · see citing works
Introduction: commodities and the politics of value
Appadurai, A. (1986) · The Social Life of Things · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819582.003 · Cited by 4,001 · see citing works
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160 · see citing works
Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala
Morris, J. S., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30976 · Cited by 1,665 · see citing works
The human amygdala in social judgment
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30982 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion
Boyer, P. (1994) · doi:10.1525/9780520911628 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Cooperation and Commune Longevity: A Test of the Costly Signaling Theory of Religion
Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/1069397103037002003 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. J. (2003) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/379260 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734944 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, A. C. T., & Stewart, B.
- Affiliations
- RMIT Europe (ES)
- Victoria University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Aaron C. T.
- Stewart, Bob
- ORCID
- Smith, Aaron C. T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-133
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134187106
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Management Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
- Keywords
- organizational rituals, cognitive capture, organizational culture, meaning-making, anxiety reduction, group solidarity, inclusion and exclusion, commitment, work structure, organizational learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review