Cited by 87Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Combined pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: medication effects, glucocorticoids, and attenuated treatment outcomes.

Open access
Otto, Michael W., McHugh, R. Kathryn, Kantak, Kathleen M.·2010·Clinical Psychology Science and Practice

Abstract

Despite the success of both pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioral interventions for the treatment of anxiety disorders, the combination of these modalities in adults has not resulted in substantial improvements in outcome relative to either strategy alone, raising questions about whether there are interfering effects that attenuate the magnitude of combination treatment benefits. In this article, we introduce an accounting of potential interference effects that expands upon arguments asserting the necessity of arousal for successful fear exposure. Specifically, recent advances in the study of the effects of cortisol on memory--suggesting that glucocorticoids are crucial to the learning of emotional material--have led us to posit that the attenuation of glucocorticoid activity by anxiolytic medications may interfere with extinction learning in exposure-based therapies. Implications for the efficacy of combination treatments for the anxiety disorders are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01198.x

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pharmacological therapies (benzodiazepine and antidepressant medications) result in response rates of 50.8-58.3% in adults with anxiety disorders.

    “pharmacological therapies (benzodiazepine and antidepressant medications) resulting in response rates (typically defined as >50% decrease in symptoms relative to baseline) of 50.8–58.3% (4, 5)”

    From Decreases in State and Trait Anxiety Post-psilocybin: A Naturalistic, Observational Study Among Retreat Attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports a 50.8% response rate for fluoxetine alone in a trial involving adults with social anxiety disorder. It does not report a 58.3% rate or establish the stated range for benzodiazepine and antidepressant therapies generally; nor does the cited passage define response as a greater-than-50% symptom decrease. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The combination of pharmacological and CBT approaches has not been found to result in more promising outcomes, with a response rate of 54.2%.

    “Additionally, the combination of the two approaches has not been found to result in more promising outcomes, with a response rate of 54.2% (5).”

    From Decreases in State and Trait Anxiety Post-psilocybin: A Naturalistic, Observational Study Among Retreat Attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract reports a 54.2% response rate for combined fluoxetine and CBT in one social-anxiety-disorder trial, compared with 51.7% for CBT alone and 50.8% for fluoxetine alone. It characterizes the broader advantage of combined treatment as modest, not absent. The claim presents the trial-specific rate without that qualification and implies no improvement. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cognitive behavioral therapies result in response rates of 51.7-53.6% in adults with anxiety disorders.

    “cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) resulting in response rates of 51.7–53.6% (5, 6) in adults with anxiety disorders.”

    From Decreases in State and Trait Anxiety Post-psilocybin: A Naturalistic, Observational Study Among Retreat Attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract reports a 51.7% response rate for CBT alone in a trial of adults with social anxiety disorder. It does not report 53.6% or establish the stated range for adults with anxiety disorders generally (searched: 53.6% and CBT response rate). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otto, M. W., McHugh, R. K., & Kantak, K. M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
Published
2010-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
91-103
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W1957546264
Cited by
87
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH081116)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
anxiety disorders, glucocorticoids, cortisol, anxiolytics, extinction learning, fear extinction, exposure therapy, interference effects, emotional memory, treatment outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review