The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Media Appropriateness.: Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media
Abstract
This study assesses a scale measuring appropriateness of media for a variety of organizational communication activities and then compares seven media across six organizational sites. The ranking of media were face-to-face, telephone, meetings, desktop video and videoconferencing, voice mail, text, and electronic mail. Although information exchange and socioemotional relations dimensions emerged, the first provided a parsimonious solution. Multidimensional scaling placed traditional media in separate clusters, and new media together with some instances of text and phone, along interpersonal-mediated and synchronous-asynchronous axes. The appropriateness of face-to-face and meetings did not change over time, whereas ratings of phone and text (to some extent) and new media did. Appropriateness of new media was weakly associated with use. finally, there was very little evidence of social information processing influence on appropriateness, except for organizational newcomers’ratings of the newest medium, desktop video.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263
Investigating the Assumptions of Uses and Gratifications Research
Lometti, G. E., Reeves, B., & Bybee, C. R. (1977) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365027700400305 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 · Cited by 2,753
Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148783 · Cited by 2,646
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2 · Cited by 1,826
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity1
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148857 · Cited by 1,511
CHANNEL EXPANSION THEORY AND THE EXPERIENTIAL NATURE OF MEDIA RICHNESS PERCEPTIONS.
Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257090 · Cited by 1,270
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x · Cited by 1,242
The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes
Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1603_2 · Cited by 703
Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of replika
Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600 · Cited by 522
Five facets of social presence in online distance education
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014 · Cited by 255
Nguyen, M. H., Gruber, J., Marler, W., Hunsaker, A., Fuchs, J., & Hargittai, E. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820985442 · Cited by 217
Han, S., Min, J., & Lee, H. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.004 · Cited by 183
The utility of home computers and media use: Implications of multimedia and connectivity
Perse, E. M., & Dunn, D. G. (1998) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838159809364461 · Cited by 166
The Role of Shared Mental Model Development in Understanding Virtual Team Effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601113475361 · Cited by 143
Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N. (2008) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650208321783 · Cited by 137
Measuring perceived social presence in distributed learning groups
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2011) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-010-9135-7 · Cited by 105
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Online Purchase Intentions: An Empirical Testing of a Multiple-Theory Model
Järveläinen, J. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919390701291000 · Cited by 86
Social copresence in anonymous social interactions using a mobile video telephone
Kang, S.-H., Watt, J. H., & Ala, S. K. (2008) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357295 · Cited by 37
Lin, W. L., Lee, C., & Law, S. H. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2662 · Cited by 30
Teubner, T., Adam, M., Camacho, S., & Hassanein, K. (2022) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2020.1871533 · Cited by 17
Mourgela, V., & Pacurar, E. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117707792 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- RICE, R. E.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-484
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2054432800
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 71.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
