Cited by 280Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Do early father–infant interactions predict the onset of externalising behaviours in young children? Findings from a longitudinal cohort study

Open access
Ramchandani, Paul G, Domoney, Jill, Sethna, Vaheshta, Psychogiou, Lamprini, Vlachos, Haido, Murray, Lynne·2013·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Factors related to parents and parenting capacities are important predictors of the development of behavioural problems in children. Recently, there has been an increasing research focus in this field on the earliest years of life, however, relatively few studies have addressed the role of fathers, despite this appearing to be particularly pertinent to child behavioural development. This study aimed to examine whether father–infant interactions at age 3 months independently predicted child behavioural problems at 1 year of age. Method: A sample of 192 families was recruited from two maternity units in the United Kingdom. Father–infant interactions were assessed in the family home and coded using the Global Rating Scales. Child behaviour problems were assessed by maternal report. Hierarchical and logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations between father–infant interaction and the development of behavioural problems. Results: Disengaged and remote interactions between fathers and their infants were found to predict externalising behavioural problems at the age of 1 year. The children of the most disengaged fathers had an increased risk of developing early externalising behavioural problems [disengaged (nonintrusive) interactions – adjusted Odds Ratio 5.33 (95% Confidence Interval; 1.39, 20.40): remote interactions adj. OR 3.32 (0.92, 12.05)] Conclusions: Disengaged interactions of fathers with their infants, as early as the third month of life, predict early behavioural problems in children. These interactions may be critical factors to address, from a very early age in the child’s life, and offer a potential opportunity for preventive intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02583.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Van Batenburg-Eddes et al. (2013) and Ramchandani et al. found no significant association between paternal depression and offspring attention and externalizing problems, respectively.

    “Van Batenburg-Eddes et al. (2013) (Generation R cohort) and Ramchandani et al. (2013) (age 3 & 12 months) found no significant association between paternal depression and offspring attention and externalizing problems, respectively.”

    From The effects of paternal depression on child and adolescent outcomes: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as Ramchandani et al. (2013)

  • Bias in cohort selection existed, with only five studies outlining inclusion/exclusion criteria.

    “Finally, bias in cohort selection existed, with only five studies outlining one or both of the inclusion/exclusion criteria (Cummings et al. 2013;Keller et al. 2009;Ramchandani et al. 2013;Shelton & Harold, 2008;Smith et al. 2013).”

    From The effects of paternal depression on child and adolescent outcomes: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as Ramchandani et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramchandani, P. G., Domoney, J., Sethna, V., Psychogiou, L., Vlachos, H., & Murray, L.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-19
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
56-64
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1607555606
Cited by
280
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
19.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
Wellcome Trust (078434/Z/05/Z, 078434)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
father-infant interaction, externalizing problems, father involvement, parenting capacity, preventive interventions, first year of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Child Behavior Disorders, Father-Child Relations, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Sex Factors, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review