Cited by 110Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

Terrible ones? Assessment of externalizing behaviors in infancy with the Child Behavior Checklist

Open access
Van Zeijl, Jantien, Mesman, Judi, Stolk, Mirjam N., Alink, Lenneke R.A., Van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J., Juffer, Femmie, Koot, Hans M.·2006·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the occurrence, cross‐informant agreement, 1‐year stability, and context characteristics of externalizing behaviors in 12‐month‐old children, as compared to 24‐ and 36‐month‐olds. Method: In a general population sample of 786 12‐month‐olds, 720 24‐month‐olds, and 744 36‐month‐olds, the CBCL/1½–5 was obtained from mothers and fathers and again one year later for a subsample of 307 children. Mothers of 1,831 children also provided complete data on child, mother, and family characteristics. Results: Over three‐fourths of the externalizing behaviors occurred in more than 10% of 12‐month‐olds, over one‐third of the items in more than 25%. For almost all externalizing behaviors, the occurrence was significantly lower in 12‐month‐olds compared to 24‐ and 36‐month‐old children. Mother–father agreement and 1‐year stability of externalizing behaviors in 12‐month‐old children were significant, but generally somewhat lower than in 24‐ and 36‐month‐olds. Context characteristics were related to externalizing behaviors in 12‐month‐olds as well as in older children. Some associations were less pronounced in 12‐month‐old children, but the overall pattern of correlates was similar across age groups. Conclusions: The results of this study show that externalizing behaviors in 12‐month‐old children merit further research and can be assessed with the CBCL in a valid way.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01616.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CBCL/1.5-5 is a validated parent report scale designed to measure behavioral, emotional and social functioning in children aged 1.5-5 years, and has been used reliably with children as young as 12 months.

    “The CBCL/1.5–5 is a validated parent report scale designed to measure behavioral, emotional and social functioning in children aged 1.5–5 years, and which has been used reliably with children as young as 12 months [54, 89].”

    From Optimizing parenting and child outcomes following parent–child interaction therapy – toddler: a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Externalizing behaviors section identifies the CBCL/1½–5 as a parent-report checklist for ages 1½–5 and reports its use with 12-month-olds. It found strong internal consistency for some externalizing scales but mediocre consistency for Overactive. The paper supports assessing externalizing behavior at 12 months, not the broader claim that the scale reliably measures behavioral, emotional, and social functioning at that age. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Westgeest, A.M.A. (1985). De relatie tussen persoonlijk- heid, steun en stress bij verzorgers met eerst gebo- renen [The relation between personality, support, and stress in caregivers with firstborn children]. Unpub- lished master's thesis, Leiden University, the Nether- lands. Manuscript accepted 15 November 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Zeijl, J., Mesman, J., Stolk, M. N., Alink, L. R. A., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., Juffer, F., & Koot, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Mesman, Judi
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-26
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
801-810
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2107265110
Cited by
110
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universiteit Leiden
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
externalizing problems, infancy, Child Behavior Checklist, cross-informant agreement, longitudinal stability, toddler development
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Internal-External Control, Male, Netherlands, Personality Assessment, Statistics as Topic, Early Intervention, Educational, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review