Cited by 737Family Dynamics and RelationshipsIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceSocial Policies and Family

Practitioner Review: Engaging fathers – recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence

Open access
Panter‐Brick, Catherine, Burgess, Adrienne, Eggerman, Mark, McAllister, Fiona, Pruett, Kyle, Leckman, James F.·2014·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Despite robust evidence of fathers’ impact on children and mothers, engaging with fathers is one of the least well‐explored and articulated aspects of parenting interventions. It is therefore critical to evaluate implicit and explicit biases manifested in current approaches to research, intervention, and policy. Methods: We conducted a systematic database and a thematic hand search of the global literature on parenting interventions. Studies were selected from Medline, Psychinfo, SSCI , and Cochrane databases, and from gray literature on parenting programs, using multiple search terms for parent, father, intervention, and evaluation. We tabulated single programs and undertook systematic quality coding to review the evidence base in terms of the scope and nature of data reporting. Results: After screening 786 nonduplicate records, we identified 199 publications that presented evidence on father participation and impact in parenting interventions. With some notable exceptions, few interventions disaggregate ‘father’ or ‘couple’ effects in their evaluation, being mostly driven by a focus on the mother–child dyad. We identified seven key barriers to engaging fathers in parenting programs, pertaining to cultural, institutional, professional, operational, content, resource, and policy considerations in their design and delivery. Conclusions: Barriers to engaging men as parents work against father inclusion as well as father retention, and undervalue coparenting as contrasted with mothering. Robust evaluations of father participation and father impact on child or family outcomes are stymied by the ways in which parenting interventions are currently designed, delivered, and evaluated. Three key priorities are to engage fathers and coparenting couples successfully, to disaggregate process and impact data by fathers, mothers, and coparents, and to pay greater attention to issues of reach, sustainability, cost, equity, and scale‐up. Clarity of purpose with respect to gender‐differentiated and coparenting issues in the design, delivery, and evaluation of parenting programs will constitute a game change in this field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12280

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bhandari N Karkara R Regional capacity building workshop on men, caring and fatherhood 2006 Kathmandu Save the Children Sweden
  2. Feinberg ME Roettger M Jones D Paul I Kan M, & (Under review). Effects of a psychosocial couple-based prevention program on adverse birth outcomes PMC4321726 24969352
  3. Flouri E Fathering & child outcomes 2005 Chichester, West Sussex John Wiley & Sons
  4. McAllister F Burgess A Kato J Barker G Fatherhood: Parenting programmes and policy – a critical review of best practice 2012 Washington, DC The Fatherhood Institute/Promundo/MenCare

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panter‐Brick, C., Burgess, A., Eggerman, M., McAllister, F., Pruett, K., & Leckman, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Fatherhood Institute London UK
Corresponding author
Panter‐Brick, Catherine
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1187-1212
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2118222273
Cited by
737
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bernard van Leer Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
Keywords
father involvement, parenting support, co-parenting, gender differences in parenting
MeSH terms
Fathers, Humans, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review