Cited by 122Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Hebbian modification of a hippocampal population pattern in the rat

Open access
King, Charles, Henze, Darrell A., Leinekugel, Xavier, Buzsáki, György·1999·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The study of the physiological role of long-term potentiation (LTP) is often hampered by the challenge of finding a physiological event that can be used to assess synaptic strength. We explored the possibility of utilising a naturally occurring event, the hippocampal sharp wave (SPW), for the assessment of synaptic strength and the induction of LTP in vivo. 2. We used two methods in which hippocampal cells were either recorded intracellularly or extracellularly in vivo. In both cases, a linear association between the magnitude of the SPW and cellular responsiveness was observed. 3. LTP was induced by depolarising cells during SPWs by either direct intracellular current injection or extracellular microstimulation adjacent to the cell body. Both of these approaches led to an increase in the slope of the linear association between SPWs and cellular responsiveness. 4. This change was achieved without a rise in overall cell excitability, implying that the synapses providing input to CA1 cells during sharp waves had undergone potentiation. 5. Our findings show that the Hebbian pairing of cellular activation with spontaneous, naturally occurring synaptic events is capable of inducing LTP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00159.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SW-Rs may conversely promote LTP and spike time-dependent plasticity in hippocampal circuits.

    “SW-Rs may conversely promote LTP and spike timedependent plasticity in hippocampal circuits (97,159,241,640,777).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [640]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, C., Henze, D. A., Leinekugel, X., & Buzsáki, G.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-11
Volume
521
Issue
1
Pages
159-167
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2155113153
Cited by
122
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH054671, MH54671)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS034994, NS-34994)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
long-term potentiation, Hebbian learning, synaptic efficacy, CA1 pyramidal neurons, microstimulation, intracellular current injection, hippocampus
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Membrane Potentials, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Pyramidal Cells, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review