Cited by 310Emotion and Mood RecognitionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychophysiological responses as indices of affective dimensions

VanOYEN WITVLIET, CHARLOTTE, VRANA, SCOTT R.·1995·Psychophysiology

Abstract

The startle reflex, facial electromyogram (EMG), and autonomic nervous system responses were examined during imagery varying in affective valence and arousal. Subjects (N = 48) imagined affective situations during tone-cued 8-s trials. Startle blink magnitudes were larger and latencies faster during negatively valent than during positively valent conditions and during high-arousal than during low-arousal conditions. Greatest heart rate acceleration and fastest and largest skin conductance responses to startle probes occurred during high-arousal imagery. Zygomatic and orbicularis oculi facial muscle activities were higher during high-arousal imagery, whereas corrugator muscle activity was higher during low-arousal imagery. Zygomatic and corrugator activity also varied with emotional valence. The startle and facial EMG responses are most parsimoniously organized by the negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) dimensions, respectively. This NA/PA framework integrates previous research, dimensional theories of emotional behavior, and physiological assessment of pathological emotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02094.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in the past few decades support a role for both discrete categories and broader dimensions related to appraisals and motivational significance in ANS activity.

    “Studies in the past few decades support a role for both, implying a gradient of autonomic specificity where autonomic differentiation exists at multiple levels (e.g., Christie and Friedman, 2004;Nyklíček et al., 1997;Witvliet and Vrana, 1995).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Witvliet and Vrana, 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VanOYEN WITVLIET, C., & VRANA, S. R.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-09
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
436-443
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2045439170
Cited by
310
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH46861, R03MH046861)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
affective imagery, emotional valence, arousal, startle response, facial electromyography, zygomaticus, corrugator supercilii, orbicularis oculi muscle, heart rate, skin conductance, autonomic nervous system, negative affect, positive affect
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Arousal, Autonomic Nervous System, Cues, Electromyography, Emotions, Face, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Psychophysiology, Reflex, Startle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review