Cited by 185Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and Treatment

Emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON): do affective valence and arousal play a role

Rhudy, Jamie L., Williams, Amy E., McCabe, Klanci M., Russell, Jennifer L., Maynard, Lauren J.·2008·Pain

Abstract

Prior research suggests emotional picture-viewing modulates motoric (nociceptive flexion reflex), autonomic (skin conductance response, heart rate acceleration), and subjective (pain rating) reactions to noxious electrodermal stimulation. The present study sought to determine whether emotional valence and arousal contribute to nociception modulation. To do so, pictures varying in emotional content (erotica, food, neutral, loss, attack) were chosen to manipulate emotional valence (pleasant=erotic and food; unpleasant=loss and attack) and arousal (low=food and loss; moderate=erotica and attack). Pictures were presented in pseudorandom order to elicit emotional processing while noxious electric stimulations were delivered to the sural nerve. Nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) magnitude, skin conductance response (SCR), heart rate (HR) acceleration, and subjective pain ratings to each stimulation were measured, standardized, averaged by picture content, and analyzed. Results suggested that picture-viewing explained 52% of the variance in the multivariate combination of the nociceptive reactions and modulated them in parallel. Pleasant pictures inhibited reactions, whereas unpleasant pictures enhanced them. However, only erotica and attack pictures elicited significant modulation relative to neutral pictures, suggesting arousal also contributed. An exploratory multilevel analysis also supported this conclusion. Together, these data suggest emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON) is associated with a valence-by-arousal interaction. Implications of these findings for how emotional picture-viewing can be used to study supraspinal modulation are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.031

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biosocial model holds that validation soothes, lowers negative affect, and reduces tension in highly emotional interactions.

    “According to the biosocial model[12; 13], validation has a soothing effect, reduces negative affect, and “takes the steam” out of interactions with high emotional arousal.[6]”

    From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [13]

  • Linehan identifies six levels of validating behaviors that people like partners, friends, and health professionals can use.

    “In the developing the construct of validation, Linehan describes six levels of validating behaviors that individuals (e.g. partners, friends, health professionals) may engage in (see Table 1).”

    From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [13]

  • The biosocial model predicts that when patients are validated after disclosing pain-related thoughts and feelings, they will feel understood and accepted, have lower emotional arousal and negative affect, and may have less pain.

    “According to the biosocial model, if patients receive validation after sharing pain-related thoughts and feelings, they will feel understood and accepted, will experience a reductions in emotional arousal and negative affect, and may experience a reduction in pain (see Figure 1, Panel B).”

    From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhudy, J. L., Williams, A. E., McCabe, K. M., Russell, J. L., & Maynard, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Tulsa (US)
Corresponding author
Rhudy, Jamie L.
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-06
Volume
136
Issue
3
Pages
250-261
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142885267
Cited by
185
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
emotional valence, emotional arousal, nociceptive flexion reflex, skin conductance response, heart rate acceleration, subjective pain ratings, sural nerve
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Arousal, Biofeedback, Psychology, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Nociceptors, Pain Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review