Cited by 170Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The role of emotion in pain modulation.

Rhudy, Jamie L., Meagher, Mary W.·2001·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

Although most agree that emotion can alter pain, little well-controlled research has been conducted to examine this issue. The present review provides psychological and physiological rationales for considering the influence of emotion on pain, followed by an overview of recent work in this area. We conclude that the pain-modulating effects of emotion are best characterized by an interaction between valence and arousal. Positive emotions lead to pain reduction as long as a minimal threshold of arousal is attained. However, negative emotions only lead to pain inhibition when they are highly arousing. Negative emotions coupled with low-to-moderate arousal facilitate pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001504-200105000-00012

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biosocial model holds that validation soothes, lowers negative affect, and reduces tension in highly emotional interactions.

    “According to the biosocial model[12; 13], validation has a soothing effect, reduces negative affect, and “takes the steam” out of interactions with high emotional arousal.[6]”

    From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [12]

  • Linehan identifies six levels of validating behaviors that people like partners, friends, and health professionals can use.

    “In the developing the construct of validation, Linehan describes six levels of validating behaviors that individuals (e.g. partners, friends, health professionals) may engage in (see Table 1).”

    From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [12]

  • The biosocial model predicts that when patients are validated after disclosing pain-related thoughts and feelings, they will feel understood and accepted, have lower emotional arousal and negative affect, and may have less pain.

    “According to the biosocial model, if patients receive validation after sharing pain-related thoughts and feelings, they will feel understood and accepted, will experience a reductions in emotional arousal and negative affect, and may experience a reduction in pain (see Figure 1, Panel B).”

    From Validating pain communication: current state of the science (2015) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhudy, J. L., & Meagher, M. W.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Meagher, Mary W.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2001-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
241-245
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329382998
Cited by
170
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
emotions, pain modulation, pain inhibition, pain facilitation, valence, arousal, positive emotions, negative emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review