Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation

Pandya, Pranav P., Snijders, Roslainde J. M., Johnson, Sarah P., de Lourdes Brizot, Maria, Nicolaids, Kypros H.·1995·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate screening for chromosomal defects by a combination of fetal nuchal translucency thickness and maternal age. Design A prospective multicentre screening study where fetal nuchal translucency thickness was measured at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Subjects 20,804 women with singleton pregnancies screened at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation from 1 September 1992 to 28 October 1994. Main outcome measures Trisomy 21 and other chromosomal defects identified by increased nuchal translucency thickness and by a combination of nuchal translucency thickness and maternal age. Results In normal fetuses nuchal translucency thickness increased significantly with crown‐rump length. The nuchal translucency was above the 95th centile in 77% (66 of 86) of fetuses with trisomy 21 and in 78% (61 of 78) of those with other chromosomal defects. On the basis of the distribution of nuchal translucency measurements in normal fetuses and those with trisomy 21, a new method of screening is proposed which involves assessment of individual risk based on the combination of fetal nuchal translucency, crown rump length and maternal age. The minimum risk was 1/100 in 4.9% of the normal pregnancies, in 80% of those with trisomy 21 and in 77% of those with other chromosomal defects. Conclusion Screening for fetal trisomy 21 can be carried out effectively during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10902.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
Pandya, P. P., Snijders, R. J. M., Johnson, S. P., de Lourdes Brizot, M., & Nicolaids, K. H.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
102
Issue
12
Pages
957-962
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2058995602
Cited by
411
References
14
FWCI
27.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10902.x
The paper
Pandya, P. P., Snijders, R. J. M., Johnson, S. P., de Lourdes Brizot, M., & Nicolaids, K. H. (1995). Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10902.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.