Cited by 387Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

Gender Differences in Self-Reported Posttraumatic Growth: A Meta-Analysis

Vishnevsky, Tanya, Cann, Arnie, Calhoun, Lawrence G., Tedeschi, Richard G., Demakis, George J.·2010·Psychology of Women Quarterly

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the direction and magnitude of gender differences in self-reported post-traumatic growth. Results from 70 studies ( N = 16,076) revealed a small to moderate gender difference ( g = .27, 95% CI = .21 -.32), with women reporting more posttraumatic growth than men. Moderator analyses were then conducted to identify possible sources of these differences. The following moderators were examined: mean age of sample, measure used, nature of the stressful event, language of the measure, and type of sample (i.e., community samples, college students, or mixed). The only significant moderator was age, with women reporting incrementally more posttraumatic growth as the mean age of the sample increased ( B = .004, p < .01, SE = .001, Q = 9.13). To check for publication bias, effect sizes were compared across published and unpublished research. The size of the gender difference was not significantly different between published ( g = .30, 95% CI = .23 -.38) and unpublished ( g = .22, 95% CI = .12 -.31) studies. The present findings indicate that modest, but reliable gender differences exist in posttraumatic growth even when unpublished data are included in the analyses. Possible explanations for these findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01546.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vishnevsky, T., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., & Demakis, G. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Venue
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2010-03
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
110-120
ISSN
  • 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6402
OpenAlex
W2066909426
Cited by
387
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, gender differences, women, age differences, life events, self-report measures, publication bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review