Cited by 11Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthChild Abuse and Trauma

Factor structure of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in a Spanish sample of adult victims of interpersonal violence in childhood

Open access
Pajón, Laura, Greco, Ana Martina, Pereda, Noemí, Gallardo-Pujol, David·2020·Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica

Abstract

Research interest in trauma as a possible cause of growth has increased in recent decades. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) is widely used to measure growth after traumatic events. The present study aimed at validating the Spanish version of the PTGI in a sample of 243 young adults (age range from 18 to 35 years old, M = 21 years, SD = 2.5) whoexperienced interpersonal victimization during their childhood and/or adolescence. Preliminary analyses showed acceptable reliability for the PTGI subscales (Cronbach’s α ranging from .61 to .89). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure that included «new perception of life», «relating to others», «personal strength», and «spiritual change». All types of victimization correlated significantly with PTGI scores. These findings provide support for the factorial validity of the PTGI and the use of the PTGI in future research examining posttraumatic growth among Spanish victims of interpersonal violence in childhood. Keywords: Victimization; Posttraumatic Growth Inventory; trauma; growth. Estructura factorial del Inventario de Crecimiento Post-traumático en una muestra española de víctimas adultas de violencia interpersonal durante la infancia Resumen: El interés científico en el trauma como posible fuente de crecimiento ha aumentado en las últimas décadas, siendo el Inventario de Crecimiento Post-traumático (PTGI) uno de los instrumentos más usados para medirlo. El estudio pretende validar la versión en castellano del PTGI en una muestra de 243 adultos jóvenes (entre 18 y 35 años, M = 21 años, DT = 2.5), víctimas de violencia en la infancia y/o adolescencia. Los análisis mostraron una fiabilidad aceptable para todas las subescalas (α =.61- .89). El análisis factorial exploratorio reveló una estructura de cuatro factores: «nueva percepción de la vida», «relación con los demás», «fuerza personal» y «cambio espiritual». Todos los tipos de victimización correlacionaron significativamente con las puntuaciones del PTGI. Los resultados aportan evidencia sobre la validez de la estructura interna del PTGI y el uso del PTGI en futuras investigaciones que examinen el crecimiento post-traumático en víctimas españolas de violencia interpersonal durante la infancia. Palabras clave: Victimización; inventario de crecimiento post-traumático; trauma; crecimiento.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5944/rppc.26017

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Costa-Requena, G., & Gil Moncayo, F. (2007). Crecimiento post- traumático en pacientes oncológicos. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 33(148), 229-250. Retrieved from http://www. uhu.es/publicaciones/ojs/index.php/amc/index
  2. Tedeschi, R. G. & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychology Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18. doi:10.1027/s15327965pli1501_01 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pajón, L., Greco, A. M., Pereda, N., & Gallardo-Pujol, D.
Affiliations
  • De Montfort University (GB)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica
Published
2020-08-21
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
101
ISSN
  • 1136-5420 (ISSN-L)
  • 2254-6057
OpenAlex
W3081108663
Cited by
11
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR 1237 GRC)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (DER2017-85269-C3-2-P)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA-Academia-2016)
  • Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España (DER2017-85269-C3-2-P)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, child victimization, interpersonal violence, Spanish adaptation, factor structure, psychometric validation, young adults, spiritual transformation, personal strengths, Spanish-speaking adults, reliability statistics, validity, cross-cultural adaptation, adolescents, trauma exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review