Cited by 418Bioenergy crop production and managementBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentBiofuel production and bioconversion

Biofuels and biodiversity: principles for creating better policies for biofuel production

GROOM, MARTHA J., GRAY, ELIZABETH M., TOWNSEND, PATRICIA A.·2008·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Biofuels are a new priority in efforts to reduce dependence on fossil fuels; nevertheless, the rapid increase in production of biofuel feedstock may threaten biodiversity. There are general principles that should be used in developing guidelines for certifying biodiversity‐friendly biofuels. First, biofuel feedstocks should be grown with environmentally safe and biodiversity‐friendly agricultural practices. The sustainability of any biofuel feedstock depends on good growing practices and sound environmental practices throughout the fuel‐production life cycle. Second, the ecological footprint of a biofuel, in terms of the land area needed to grow sufficient quantities of the feedstock, should be minimized. The best alternatives appear to be fuels of the future, especially fuels derived from microalgae. Third, biofuels that can sequester carbon or that have a negative or zero carbon balance when viewed over the entire production life cycle should be given high priority. Corn‐based ethanol is the worst among the alternatives that are available at present, although this is the biofuel that is most advanced for commercial production in the United States. We urge aggressive pursuit of alternatives to corn as a biofuel feedstock. Conservation biologists can significantly broaden and deepen efforts to develop sustainable fuels by playing active roles in pursuing research on biodiversity‐friendly biofuel production practices and by helping define biodiversity‐friendly biofuel certification standards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00879.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GROOM, M. J., GRAY, E. M., & TOWNSEND, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Bothell (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
602-609
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2037180230
Cited by
418
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 37
FWCI
66.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
biofuels, biodiversity, biofuel feedstock, biofuel policy, biofuel certification, ecological footprint, microalgal biofuels, carbon sequestration, corn ethanol, sustainable agriculture, fossil fuel dependence
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Bioelectric Energy Sources, Carbon, Conservation of Energy Resources, Environmental Pollutants, Environmental Pollution, Plants, Public Policy, Research, Ecosystem, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review