Cited by 36Algal biology and biofuel productionBioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and Management

Potential energy production from algae on marginal land in China

Zhang, Qingtao, Ma, Jiong, Qiu, Guoyu, Li, Li, Geng, Shu, Hasi, E., Li, Cheng, Wang, Guangyi +1 more·2012·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This study is aimed to systematically estimate marginal land resources with different grades (total area; land with certain eco-environmental-economic feasibility; centralized reserve land) in China, and evaluate potential energy production from microalgae on marginal lands in the long-, mid- and near-term, based on a model. The annual potential energy production from algae in total marginal land of China (APEMC) was estimated to 4.19 billion standard coal equivalent (tce), far more than total annual energy consumption equivalent in China (TECCE) in 2007. For microalgae with 35% lipid content, the APEMC in the mid-term would be 37.6-65.8% of the TECCE in 2007. The corresponding annual CO(2) emission mitigation by replacement of fossil fuels by algal bioenergy would be 4.27-7.44 billiont. Although Southwest China provides the highest potential algae production in the long-term, Northwest China provides the highest value in the near-term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.084

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In China the use of prime land to produce bioenergy is not allowed, therefore wasteland and paddy lands (natural grassland, sparse forestland, scrubland and unused land), described as marginal lands, are used to grow energy crops.

    “In China the use of prime land to produce bioenergy is not allowed, therefore wasteland and paddy lands (natural grassland, sparse forestland, scrubland and unused land), which are described as marginal lands are used to grow energy crops (Zhang et al., 2012).”

    From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Q., Ma, J., Qiu, G., Li, L., Geng, S., Hasi, E., Li, C., Wang, G., & Li, X.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Qiu, Guoyu
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
109
Pages
252-260
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986441806
Cited by
36
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Keywords
microalgae, marginal land, land evaluation, biofuel potential, algal lipid content, CO2 emission reduction, fossil fuel substitution, China, Southwest China, Northwest China
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Ethanol, Carbon Dioxide, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Energy-Generating Resources, Fossil Fuels, Models, Theoretical, Biomass, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review