Cited by 119Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Noninvasive brain stimulation to modulate neuroplasticity in traumatic brain injury

Villamar, Mauricio Fernando, Santos Portilla, Andrea, Fregni, Felipe, Zafonte, Ross·2012·Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface

Abstract

Objective To review the use of noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS) as a therapeutic tool to enhance neuroplasticity following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Materials and methods Based on a literature search, we describe the pathophysiological events following TBI and the rationale for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in this setting. Results The pathophysiological mechanisms occurring after TBI vary across time and therefore require differential interventions. Theoretically, given the neurophysiological effects of both TMS and tDCS, these tools may: 1) decrease cortical hyperexcitability acutely after TBI; 2) modulate long-term synaptic plasticity as to avoid maladaptive consequences; and 3) combined with physical and behavioral therapy, facilitate cortical reorganization and consolidation of learning in specific neural networks. All of these interventions may help decrease the burden of disabling sequelae after brain injury. Conclusions Evidence from animal and human studies reveals the potential benefit of NBS in decreasing the extent of injury and enhancing plastic changes to facilitate learning and recovery of function in lesioned neural tissue. However, this evidence is mainly theoretical at this point. Given safety constraints, studies in TBI patients are necessary to address the role of NBS in this condition as well as to further elucidate its therapeutic effects and define optimal stimulation paramet…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00474.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villamar, M. F., Santos Portilla, A., Fregni, F., & Zafonte, R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
326-338
ISSN
1094-7159 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1826016273
Cited by
119
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
non-invasive brain stimulation, traumatic brain injury, neuroplasticity, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, cortical hyperexcitability, synaptic plasticity, cortical reorganization, functional recovery
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adaptation, Physiological, Brain Injuries, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Physical Therapy Modalities, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review