Cited by 34Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

The pain provocation technique for adolescents with chronic pain: Preliminary evidence for its effectiveness

Hechler, Tanja, Dobe, Michael, Damschen, Uta, Blankenburg, Markus, Schroeder, Sandra, Kosfelder, Joachim, Zernikow, Boris·2010·Pain Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the "pain provocation technique" (PPT)--a focused treatment strategy incorporating interoceptive exposure (i.e., imagining increases in pain intensity), bilateral stimulation (tactile stimulation), and implementation of pain-related coping to decrease pain intensity--for adolescents suffering from chronic pain. DESIGN: Prospective observational comparative study. METHODS: Adolescents utilizing PPT (19 boys and 21 girls) within multimodal inpatient treatment were compared with adolescents in standard multimodal inpatient treatment matched for age, gender, and diagnosis. Core outcome variables (pain intensity, disability, emotional distress) were assessed at admission and 3 months posttreatment. RESULTS: Adolescents in the PPT group demonstrated a sharper decrease in pain intensity and school aversion. Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in disability and emotional distress. CONCLUSIONS: Results are discussed in terms of the importance of focused treatment strategies such as interoceptive exposure for adolescents suffering from disabling chronic pain. Future studies are warranted to carefully investigate the effectiveness and possible process of change during the PPT such as sensory, cognitive, emotional, and memory aspects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00839.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of interoceptive exposure techniques has been associated with decreased pain intensity and school avoidance, and data suggest these techniques are beneficial at reducing pain severity and altering relevant emotions related to pain.

    “Use of interoceptive exposure techniques have been associated with decreased pain intensity and school avoidance, and data suggest that using these techniques are beneficial at reducing pain severity and altering relevant emotions related to pain [96].”

    From Best-evidence for the rehabilitation of chronic pain part 1: Pediatric pain (2019) · cites this paper as [96]

    The Abstract reports sharper decreases in pain intensity and school aversion among adolescents receiving the pain provocation technique (PPT). But the Introduction describes PPT as combining interoceptive exposure with tapping and coping strategies, so the study does not isolate the effect of interoceptive exposure. The Discussion suggests that school-related emotions may have changed, while noting that these cognitions and emotions were not systematically assessed; page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Duquette M, Roy M, Leporé F, Peretz I, Rainville P. Cerebral mechanisms involved in the interaction between pain and emotion. Rev Neurol 2007;163(2):169-79.
  2. Price DD, Bushnell MC. Overview of pain dimensions and their psychological modulation. In: Price DD, Bushnell MC, eds. Psychological Methods of Pain Control: Basic Science and Clinical Practice. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 2004:3-17.
  3. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its conse- quences in chronic muskuloskeletal pain: A state of art. Pain 2000;85(3):317-32.
  4. Asmundson GJG. Anxiety sensitivity and chronic pain: Empirical findings, clinical implications, and future directions. In: Taylor S, ed. Anxiety Sensitivity: Theory, Research and Treatment of Fear of Anxiety. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999:269-85.
  5. van den Hout M, Muris P, Salemink E, Kindt M. Auto- biographical memoreis become less vivid and emo- tional after eye movements. Br J Clin Psychol 2001;40:121-30.
  6. Dobe M, Damschen U, Reiffer-Wiesel B, Sauer C, Zernikow B. Three-week multimodal inpatient treat- ment of children with chronic pain: First results of the long-term follow-up. Schmerz 2006;20(1):51-60.
  7. Schroeder S, Hechler T, Denecke H, et al. German Pain Questionnaire for Children, Adolescents and Parents (DSF-KJ)-A multimodal questionnaire for diagnosis and treatment of children and adolescents suffering from chronic pain. Der Schmerz 2010;24:23- 37.
  8. Hübner B, Hechler T, Dobe M, et al. Pain-related dis- ability in adolescents suffering from chronic pain: Pre- liminary examination of the Pediatric Pain Disability Index (P-PDI). Schmerz 2009;23(1):20-32.
  9. Wieczerkowski W, Nickel H, Janowksi A, Fittkau B, Rauer W. Angstfragebogen Für Schüler (FS), 6th edition. Göttingen: Westermann; 1981.
  10. Stiensmeier-Pelster J, Schürmann M, Duda K. Depressions-Inventar Für Kinder Und Jugendliche (DIKJ), 2nd edition. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000.
  11. Knorth EJ, Knot-Dickscheit J, Tausendfreund T, Schulze GC, Strijker J. Child and youth care: Ambulant and non-ambulant. Praxis Kinderpsychologie Kinderpsychiatrie 2009;58(5):330-50.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hechler, T., Dobe, M., Damschen, U., Blankenburg, M., Schroeder, S., Kosfelder, J., & Zernikow, B.
Affiliations
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Hechler, Tanja
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2010-06
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
897-910
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W2114535870
Cited by
34
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vodafone Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pain, adolescents, interoceptive exposure, bilateral stimulation, pain coping, pain intensity, disability, emotional distress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Child, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review