Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuromodulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei in the Treatment of Generalized Seizures and the Improvement of the Quality of Life in Patients with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome

Open access
Velasco, Ana Luisa, Velasco, Francisco, Jiménez, Fiacro, Velasco, Marcos, Castro, Guillermo, Carrillo‐Ruiz, José D., Fanghänel, Guillermo, Boleaga, Bernardo·2006·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ESCM (electrical stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus) in treatment of generalized seizures of the Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and improvement of patient disability. Methods: Thirteen patients with LGS were studied. They had severe generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTC) and atypical absences (AA). All patients had at least a 6‐month baseline before bilateral electrode implantation to the centromedian (CM) nuclei of the thalamus to undergo therapeutic ESCM. Once implanted, electrodes were temporally externalized through a retromastoid point for electrophysiologic confirmation of their placement. After target confirmation, stimulation parameters were set. Patients came for follow‐up assessment of seizures and neurophysiologic tests every 3 months during an 18‐month period of time; AED therapy was not modified. Results: The surgical procedure as well as electrical stimulation was well tolerated by all patients. No side effects occurred with the therapeutic stimulation parameters used, and patients were not aware of device activation. Two patients were explanted because of repeated and multiple skin erosions that could not be controlled by plastic surgery procedures. Overall seizure reduction was 80%. The three patients with poorest outcomes for seizure control did not improve their ability scale score. In contrast, the two patients rendered seizure free are living a normal life at present. The remaining eight patients experienced progressive improvement, from being totally disabled to becoming independent in five cases and partially dependent in two. Patients with adequate electrode placement had a seizure reduction >87%. To consider that an electrode is correctly placed, both stereotactic placement and neurophysiologic responses are taken into account. Conclusions: ESCM provides a nonlesional, neuromodulatory method with improvement in seizure outcome and in the abilities of patients with severe LGS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00593.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Velasco, A. L., Velasco, F., Jiménez, F., Velasco, M., Castro, G., Carrillo‐Ruiz, J. D., Fanghänel, G., & Boleaga, B.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
1203-1212
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1993113754
Cited by
311
References
34
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuromodulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei in the Treatment of Generalized Seizures and the Improvement of the Quality of Life in Patients with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00593.x
The paper
Velasco, A. L., Velasco, F., Jiménez, F., Velasco, M., Castro, G., Carrillo‐Ruiz, J. D., Fanghänel, G., & Boleaga, B. (2006). Neuromodulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei in the Treatment of Generalized Seizures and the Improvement of the Quality of Life in Patients with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00593.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.