Cited by 291Neurological disorders and treatmentsTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

A Patient with a Resistant Major Depression Disorder Treated with Deep Brain Stimulation in the Inferior Thalamic Peduncle

Jiménez, Fiacro, Velasco, Francisco, Salin-Pascual, Rafael, Hernández, José A., Velasco, Marcos, Criales, José L., Nicolini, Humberto·2005·Neurosurgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: The present report explored the effect of electrical stimulation on the inferior thalamic peduncle in a patient with resistant major depression disorder (MDD). CLINICAL PRESENTATION: This report refers to a 49-year-old woman with a history of recurrent episodes of major depression for 20 years (12 episodes and 2 hospitalizations), fulfilling Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, revised, criteria for MDD; in addition, the patient met criteria for borderline personality disorder and bulimia. Her longest episode of depression with suicidal ideation began 5 years before surgery. The patient's symptom array responded poorly to different combinations of antidepressants, cognitive therapy, and electroconvulsive therapy, which induced improvement only for short periods of time. Immediately before surgery, her Global Assessment of Functioning score was 20 and her Hamilton Depression Scale score ranged from 33 to 42. The patient was proposed for surgery for MDD. INTERVENTION: The patient had bilateral eight-contact electrodes stereotactically implanted for stimulation of areas at and around the inferior thalamic peduncle. Electrode position was corroborated by unilateral electrical stimulation searching for recruiting responses and regional direct current shifts in the electroencephalogram. Recording electrodes were replaced by tetrapolar electrodes for deep brain stimulation and connected to an internalized stimulation system for continuous bipolar stimulation at 130 Hz, 0.45 milliseconds, 2.5 V. Bimonthly follow-up included psychiatric and neuropsychological evaluations performed over the course of 24 months. After 8 months of ON stimulation, the patient entered a double-blind protocol with stimulators turned OFF. Improvement of depression measured by the Hamilton Depression Scale score was evident after initial placement of electrodes without electrical stimulation. Depression relapsed partially at the end of the first week. Electrical stimulation further improved depression, normalizing depression scores and neuropsychological performance. Patient depression scores ranked between 2 and 8 during 8 months of ON stimulation without antidepressant medication. After stimulation was turned OFF, spontaneous fluctuations in patient symptoms reflected by Hamilton Depression Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning scores were documented; these fluctuations disappeared after stimulation was turned on by Month 20. CONCLUSION: Complicated patients with comorbid conditions are common referrals to psychosurgery services. In this report, we present promising results of electrical stimulation of the inferior thalamic peduncle to treat recurrent unipolar depression in a patient with MDD and borderline personality disorder who responded poorly to treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1227/01.neu.0000170434.44335.19

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first case study of ITP-DBS for treatment-resistant depression showed remission at 12 months and at last follow-up.

    “The first case study of ITP-DBS for TRD demonstrated remission at 12 months and last follow-up [75].”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [75]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiménez, F., Velasco, F., Salin-Pascual, R., Hernández, J. A., Velasco, M., Criales, J. L., & Nicolini, H.
Affiliations
  • Mexican Social Security Institute (MX)
  • Psychiatry Department, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Unit for Stereotactic, Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Hospital General de México (MX)
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX)
Venue
Neurosurgery
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
585-593
ISSN
  • 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4040
OpenAlex
W1993492541
Cited by
291
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, deep brain stimulation, thalamus, psychosurgery, recurrent unipolar depression, borderline personality disorder, bulimia nervosa, psychiatric comorbidity, stereotactic electrode implantation, bipolar stimulation, antidepressant-refractory depression, depression relapse, neuropsychological outcomes, suicidal ideation, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Electroencephalography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Thalamus, Time Factors, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review