Cited by 182Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Pain-related catastrophizing as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in chronic pain

Edwards, Robert R., Smith, Michael T., Kudel, Ian, Haythornthwaite, Jennifer·2006·Pain

Abstract

Living with chronic pain is associated with many deleterious outcomes, including a substantially increased risk of suicide. While many general risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior have been identified, few studies have examined pain-related factors that confer increased or decreased risk for suicidality. The present study assessed individual differences in the use of pain-related coping strategies and pain-related catastrophizing as correlates of suicidal ideation in patients with chronic pain. A total of 1512 patients seeking treatment for chronic pain completed a variety of questionnaires assessing pain, coping, and psychosocial functioning. On written questionnaires, approximately 32% of this clinic sample reported some form of recent suicidal ideation. The two most consistent predictors of the presence and degree of suicidal ideation were the magnitude of depressive symptoms and the degree of pain-related catastrophizing, a maladaptive cognitive/emotional pain-coping strategy. Demographic and other pain-related variables such as pain severity and duration were not generally robust predictors of suicidal ideation in this sample of patients with chronic pain. These are the first findings to suggest a unique (e.g., independent of pain severity or depressive symptomatology) association between pain-coping strategies and suicide-related cognitions in the context of chronic pain. Further research in this area, including the addition of suicide prevention materials to pain-coping skills training programs, may benefit large numbers of individuals who are at elevated suicide risk as a consequence of chronic pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2006.07.004

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, R. R., Smith, M. T., Kudel, I., & Haythornthwaite, J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Health Services Research & Development (US)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Robert R.
Venue
Pain
Published
2006-12
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
272-279
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080362587
Cited by
182
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7k23ar051315-05)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS047168)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR051315)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
suicidal ideation, chronic pain, pain coping, depressive symptoms, suicide risk factors, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Attempted, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review