Cited by 186Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersHealthcare Quality and ManagementHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Sustainability and Scalability of the Hospital Elder Life Program at a Community Hospital

Open access
Rubin, Fred H., Neal, Kelly, Fenlon, Kerry, Hassan, Shuja, Inouye, Sharon K.·2011·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

The Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP), an effective intervention to prevent delirium in older hospitalized adults, has been successfully replicated in a community teaching hospital as a quality improvement project. This article reports on successfully sustaining the program over 7 years and expanding its scale from one to six inpatient units at the same hospital. The program currently serves more than 7,000 older patients annually and is accepted as the standard of care throughout the hospital. Innovations that enhanced scalability and widespread implementation included ensuring dedicated staffing for the program, local adaptations to streamline protocols, continuous recruitment of volunteers, and more‐efficient data collection. Outcomes include a lower rate of incident delirium; shorter length of stay (LOS); greater satisfaction of patients, families, and nursing staff; and significantly lower costs for the hospital. The financial return of the program, estimated at more than $7.3 million per year during 2008, comprises cost savings from delirium prevention and revenue generated from freeing up hospital beds (shorter LOS of HELP patients with and without delirium). Delirium poses a major challenge for hospital quality of care, patient safety, Medicare no‐pay conditions, and costs of hospital care for older persons. Faced with rising numbers of elderly patients, hospitals can use HELP to improve the quality and cost‐effectiveness of care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03243.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although HELP is cost effective, it requires substantial training and monitoring of a large team of volunteers, which can serve as a barrier to adoption, especially in safety-net facilities with limited resources.

    “Although the HELP program is cost effective, it requires substantial training and monitoring of a large team of volunteers, which can serve as a barrier to adoption, especially in safety-net facilities with limited resources, serving high-risk patient populations [21-23].”

    From A Protocol-Driven, Bedside Digital Conversational Agent to Support Nurse Teams and Mitigate Risks of Hospitalization in Older Adults: Case Control Pre-Post Study (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction reports HELP’s cost-effectiveness. Methods (Maintaining quality and Dissemination process) describe standardized volunteer training and supervision of a large volunteer pool; Results (Challenges and successes encountered) describe recruitment and staffing challenges. The paper does not establish that these requirements are a barrier to adoption specifically in resource-limited safety-net facilities. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubin, F. H., Neal, K., Fenlon, K., Hassan, S., & Inouye, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Shadyside Hospital (US)
  • Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
359-365
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1607329473
Cited by
186
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K24AG000949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
Hospital Elder Life Program, delirium prevention, program sustainability, scalability, community teaching hospital, quality improvement, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, cost reduction, program staffing, volunteer recruitment, patient satisfaction, nursing satisfaction, patient safety
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Delirium, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review