Cited by 74Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

A prospective study of anticardiolipin antibodies as a risk factor for venous thrombosis in a general population (the HUNT study)

Open access
NAESS, I.A., CHRISTIANSEN, S.C., CANNEGIETER, S.C., ROSENDAAL, F.R., HAMMERSTROEM, J.·2006·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

We prospectively examined whether there is an association between elevated anticardiolipin antibody levels and the risk for a future first venous thrombosis (VT) in a general population. We studied this in a large population-based nested case-cohort study of 508 VT cases and 1464 matched control subjects from a cohort of 66,140 participants in the Health Study of Nord-Trøndelag in Norway. Venous thrombosis was validated using standardized criteria for venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Prethrombotic serum anticardiolipin antibodies were measured by an enzyme-linked immunoassay. There was no association between elevated anticardiolipin antibody levels and subsequent venous thrombosis, overall or after stratification by sex, different age groups or idiopathic vs. secondary thrombosis. The overall odds ratio was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.71-1.74) for greater than vs. less than the 95th percentile of anticardiolipin antibody levels. In conclusion, in this general population sample elevated anticardiolipin antibody levels was not a risk factor for subsequent venous thrombosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01691.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrospective, case-control and cross-sectional studies with different designs, patient selection criteria, aPL profiles and risk factors have produced contradictory results.

    “Retrospective, [1][2][3][4] case-control [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and cross-sectional 13,14 studies with different designs, patient selection criteria, aPL profiles and risk factors have produced contradictory results.”

    From Risk factors for a first thrombotic event in antiphospholipid antibody carriers: a prospective multicentre follow-up study. (2011) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports differing findings across prior studies, and the Discussion (page unavailable) contrasts the HUNT results with other studies while identifying differences in design, participant selection and antibody assays. Our copy does not establish the sentence’s specific claim about cross-sectional studies or show that differing risk factors account for the contradictory results. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Boey ML, Patel BM, Mackworth-Young CG, Loizou S, Hughes GR. Anticardiolipin antibodies: detection by radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 1983; 2: 1211-4.
  2. Galli M, Comfurius P, Maassen C, Hemker HC, de Baets MH, Breda- Vriesman PJ, Barbui T, Zwaal RF, Bevers EM. Anticardiolipin anti- bodies (ACA) directed not to cardiolipin but to a plasma protein co- factor. Lancet 1990; 335: 1544-7.
  3. Matsuura E, Igarashi Y, Fujimoto M, Ichikawa K, Koike T. Anti- cardiolipin cofactor(s) and differential diagnosis of autoimmune disease. Lancet 1990; 336: 177-8.
  4. McNeil HP, Simpson RJ, Chesterman CN, Krilis SA. Anti-phosp- holipid antibodies are directed against a complex antigen that includes a lipid-binding inhibitor of coagulation: beta 2-glycoprotein I (apo- lipoprotein H). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 4120-4.
  5. Roubey RA. Immunology of the antiphospholipid antibody syn- drome. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 1444-54.
  6. Hughes GR. Thrombosis, abortion, cerebral disease, and the lupus anticoagulant. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983; 287: 1088-9.
  7. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, Lockshin MD, Branch DW, Piette JC, Brey R, Derksen R, Harris EN, Hughes GR, Triplett DA, Khamashta MA. International consensus statement on prelim- inary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1309- 11.
  8. Asherson RA, Khamashta MA, Ordi-Ros J, Derksen RH, MacHin SJ, Barquinero J, Outt HH, Harris EN, Vilardell-Torres M, Hughes GR. The ÔprimaryÕ antiphospholipid syndrome: major clinical and serological features. Medicine (Baltimore) 1989; 68: 366-74.
  9. Love PE, Santoro SA. Antiphospholipid antibodies: anticardiolipin and the lupus anticoagulant in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in non-SLE disorders. Prevalence and clinical significance. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 682-98.
  10. Bongard O, Reber G, Bounameaux H, de Moerloose P. Anticardio- lipin antibodies in acute venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1992; 67: 724.
  11. Finazzi G, Brancaccio V, Moia M, Ciaverella N, Mazzucconi MG, Schinco PC, Ruggeri M, Pogliani EM, Gamba G, Rossi E, Baudo F, Manotti C, D'Angelo A, Palareti G, De S, V, Berrettini M, Barbui T. Natural history and risk factors for thrombosis in 360 patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: a four-year prospective study from the Italian Registry. Am J Med 1996; 100: 530-6.
  12. Oger E, Lernyer C, Dueymes M, Le Moigne E, Bressolette L, Escoffre M, Youinou P, Mottier D. Association between IgM anticardiolipin antibodies and deep venous thrombosis in patients without systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 1997; 6: 455-61.
  13. Rance A, Emmerich J, Fiessinger JN. Anticardiolipin antibodies and recurrent thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77: 221-2.
  14. Stegnar M, Bozic B, Peternel P, Kveder T, Vene N, Rozman B. Pre- valence of antiphospholipid antibodies in deep vein thrombosis and their relationship to blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. Thromb Res 1991; 63: 433-43.
  15. Paramsothy K, Wells PS. Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Blood 2004; 104: 153a.
  16. Holmen J, Midthjell K, Kru¨ger Ø, Langhammer A. The Nord- Trøndelag Health Study 1995-1997 (HUNT2). Nor Epidemiol 2003; 13: 19-32.
  17. Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Patel SP, Hughes GR. Evaluation of the anti- cardiolipin antibody test: report of an international workshop held 4 April 1986. Clin Exp Immunol 1987; 68: 215-22.
  18. Arnout J, Vermylen J. Current status and implications of autoimmune antiphospholipid antibodies in relation to thrombotic disease. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1: 931-42.
  19. Tincani A, Allegri F, Sanmarco M, Cinquini M, Taglietti M, Bale- strieri G, Koike T, Ichikawa K, Meroni P, Boffa MC. Anticardiolipin antibody assay: a methodological analysis for a better consensus in routine determinations -a cooperative project of the European Anti- phospholipid Forum. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 575-83.
  20. De Groot PG, Lutters B, Derksen RH, Lisman T, Meijers JC, Rose- ndaal FR. Lupus anticoagulants and the risk of a first episode of deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 1993-7.
  21. Vila P, Hernandez MC, Lopez-Fernandez MF, Batlle J. Prevalence, follow-up and clinical significance of the anticardiolipin antibodies in normal subjects. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72: 209-13.
  22. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, Clement C, Robinson KS, Lewandowski B. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NAESS, I. A., CHRISTIANSEN, S. C., CANNEGIETER, S. C., ROSENDAAL, F. R., & HAMMERSTROEM, J.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
44-49
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064072392
Cited by
74
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
anticardiolipin antibodies, venous thrombosis, thrombosis risk factors, antiphospholipid antibodies, idiopathic venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, HUNT study, general population
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, Venous Thrombosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review