Cited by 78Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

Laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome: a plethora of obstacles to overcome

Open access
Devreese, Katrien, Hoylaerts, Marc F.·2009·European Journal Of Haematology

Abstract

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is defined by two major elements: the presence in plasma of auto-antibodies, i.e. antiphospholipid antibodies and the occurrence of clinical features, categorised as vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. In contrast to recent reviews on the physiopathology of APS, the present review focuses on the laboratory diagnosis of APS. The original clinical and laboratory criteria that defined patients with APS were set in 1998 in the so-called Sapporo criteria. Although a revision of these criteria was published in 2006, a number of questions on the laboratory diagnosis of APS remain unresolved. The highlight in this review will therefore be on the potential and limitations of the detection of the lupus anticoagulant, as an established laboratory criterion for the diagnosis of APS. The strengths and weaknesses of the current laboratory guidelines are discussed against our current insight in the physiopathology of APS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01243.x

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LA detection relies on phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests, which make the methodology and interpretation difficult because anticoagulant therapy and acute phase proteins can interfere.

    “LA detection is based on phospholipid (PL)-dependent coagulation tests, which complicate the methodology and hamper its interpretation because of interference, for instance by anticoagulant therapy and some acute phase response proteins.3,4”

    From Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2020) · cites this paper as [4]

    The “Lupus anticoagulant testing” section says LAC detection uses phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays and describes the methodology as complicated. The paper also says anticoagulant therapy can prolong these assays and produce false-positive results. The passages do not establish the claimed interference from acute-phase response proteins. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Audrain MA, El-Kouri D, Hamidou MA, Mioche L, Ibara A, Langlois ML, Muller JY. Value of autoanti- bodies to beta(2)-glycoprotein 1 in the diagnosis of anti- phospholipid syndrome. Rheumatology 2002;41:550-3.
  2. Devreese KMJ. Evaluation of new commercial ELISA kits in the laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in view of the revised classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2006;17:651-9.
  3. Male C, Foulon D, Hoogendoom H, Vegh P, Silver- man E, David M, Mitchell L. Predictive value of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Blood 2005;106:4152-258.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devreese, K., & Hoylaerts, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Devreese, Katrien
Venue
European Journal Of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-10
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 0902-4441 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0609
OpenAlex
W2003142837
Cited by
78
References
123
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal Of Haematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fondation Leducq
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, laboratory diagnosis, Sapporo criteria, venous thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, diagnostic criteria, laboratory guidelines
MeSH terms
Blood Coagulation Tests, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Serologic Tests, Thrombin, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review