The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing need for innovative methods of dealing with complex, social problems. New types of collaborative efforts have emerged as a result of the inability of more traditional bureaucratic hierarchical arrangements such as departmental programs to resolve these problems. Network structures are one such arrangement that is at the forefront of this movement. Although collaboration through network structures establishes an innovative response to dealing with social issues, there remains an expectation that outcomes and processes are based on traditional ways of working. It is necessary for practitioners and policy makers alike to begin to understand the realities of what can be expected from network structures in order to maximize the benefits of these unique mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Challenge of Collaborative Governance
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000) · Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory · doi:10.1080/14719030000000021 · Cited by 455
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Ackoff Russell L., 1974, Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems
- Agranoff Robert, 2001, Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management, 11
- Alter Catherine, 1993, Organizations Working Together
- Boorman Cathy, 2002, Governing Local Communities: Building State and Community Capacity, 57
- Chisholm Donald, 1989, Coordination without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems, 10.1525/9780520352070 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1059601196212006 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00842.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00842.x
- Clarke Michael, 1997, Handling the Wicked Issues: A Challenge for Government
- Considine Mark, 2001, Enterprising the State: The Public Management ofWelfare‐to‐Work
- Davis Glyn, 2000, Institutions on the Edge, 74
- 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01391.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01391.x
- Feyerherm Anne E., 1995, Changing and Converging Mind‐Sets of Participants During Collaborative Environmental Rule‐Making: Two Negotiated Regulation Case Studies, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 231
- Funnell Warrick, 2001, Government by Fiat
- Gage Robert W., 1990, Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks
- Gray Barbara, 1989, Collaborating
- Hanf Kenneth, 1978, Interorganizational Policy Making
- 10.1108/09513559610153863 · DOI · Paper page
- Keast Robyn, 2001, Government Service Delivery Project: A New Governance Approach for Queensland, Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 7, 51
- Keast Robyn, 2002, The Government Service Delivery Program: A Case Study of the Push and Pull of Central Government Coordination, Public Management Review, 4, 1
- 10.4135/9781446217658 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/14719030000000007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01900698808524595 · DOI
- 10.1177/027507409402400106 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00838.x · DOI
- Mandell Myrna P., 2001, Getting Results through Collaboration: Net works and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management
- Mandell Myrna P., 1988, Special Symposium: Management in the Intergovernmental System: Networks and Strategies, International Journal of Public Administration, 11, 1
- 10.1080/1461667032000066417 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1468-0009.00170 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/976691 · DOI · Paper page
- Pearson Noel, 1999, Positive and Negative Welfare and Australia's Indigenous Communities, Family Matters, 54, 30
- Provan Keith G., 1991, Institutional Norms and Organizational Involvement in a Service‐Implementation Network, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 391
- Perri, 1997, Holistic Government
- Perri, 1999, Governing in the Round: Strategies for Holistic Government
- 10.5040/9781350391246 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01558.x · DOI
- University of Queensland, 2001, Goodna Services Getting Better, Communicate: Community Service and Research Centre Review, 37, 17
- 10.1177/009539979102200405 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x · Cited by 2,403
Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399713481601 · Cited by 1,514
Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It
McGuire, M. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x · Cited by 933
Public value creation through collaborative innovation
Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165 · Cited by 455
NETWORKING LITERATURE ABOUT DETERMINANTS OF NETWORK EFFECTIVENESS
TURRINI, A., CRISTOFOLI, D., FROSINI, F., & NASI, G. (2009) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01791.x · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-371
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W1492197403
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00380.x
- The paper
- Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00380.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
